Skip to main content

5 More Piquant Thoughts

5. It's not hard. Freedom means being able to do what you will within the commands of the gospel. If my weaker brother asks me not to eat or drink for his sake, his needs are greater than my freedom. I've done this a million times. If you struggle with a sin in some area, you are not as free as the man who doesn't. You are bound by the chains of the gospel, even if another finds your self-imposed restrictions limiting for him. He cannot tell you to adopt his standard if this would harm you, and you can't judge him for his, either. We've got to back each other up in our mutual pursuit of holiness. This is charity, and this is what St. Paul was getting at. I think some of you in regard to drinking give cautions to other Christians in order to protect weaker brothers, but the truth is, you actually are that weaker brother. If you believe a brother or sister has sinned, tell him or her. There is no need for general "cautions." The strong Christian worries about himself, primarily, and not what others might do. (And I do not like to make subjective anecdotal statements relating to the alleged superiority of Catholicism, but if I did, food and drink would be at the top of that list. We're just healthier about these things; we don't bother people about those judgment call kind of things.

4. The Catechism is for all of us, of course, but did you know it was envisioned as kind of like Cliff's Notes for the bishops? Maybe some American bishops are not as good as they could be simply because they have not read it consistently, or they think they're too good for the basics. Pope Francis is who he is because he's never thought he was too good to go back to the beginning. Maybe the life of continual conversion is really just getting better and better at the basics. Whoa. Stew on that for awhile.

3. Yes, in fact, I unreservedly love Pope Francis. Let the books be written long after he has left us. We can see he loves Christ and the Church; let us remember that we have endured far worse, despite whatever quibbles we might have. I'll take "Borgia Popes" for $1000, Alex.

2. You might want to properly define semi-Pelagianism before you go tossing it around. I have no trouble at least imagining that the Catholic view of salvation ascribes too much to human ability; it is not the fact of co-operation that makes Pelagianism and semi-Pelagianism false; it is rather the basic contention that man is able to make the first move on the supernatural level without grace. There is a 92.4% chance you've gotten this wrong if you are a Calvinist. I did it, too. Everyone together: "The Catholic Church believes salvation is ever and always by God's grace." You don't have to like the system, but there ain't Pelagius anywhere in it. Trust me, I looked.

1. No, seriously. Someone stole our antiphons, and it's no longer amusing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hilarious Com-Box Quote of The Day: "I was caught immediately because it is the Acts of the Apostles, not the Acts of the Holy Spirit Acting Erratically."--Donald Todd, reacting to the inartful opposition of the Holy Spirit and the Magisterium. Mark Galli, an editor at Christianity Today, had suggested that today's "confusion" in evangelicalism replicates a confusion on the day of Pentecost. Mr. Todd commented after this reply , and the original article is here. My thoughts: By what means was this Church-less "consensus" formed? If the Council did not possess the authority to adjudicate such questions, who does? If the Council Fathers did not intend to be the arbiters, why do they say that they do? At the risk of being rude, I would define evangelicalism as, "Whatever I want or need to believe at any particular time." Ecclesial authority to settle a particular question is a step forward, but only as long as, "God alone is Lord of the con

A Friend I Once Had, And The Dogmatic Principle

 I once had a friend, a dear friend, who helped me with personal care needs in college. Reformed Presbyterian to the core. When I was a Reformed Presbyterian, I visited their church many times. We were close. I still consider his siblings my friends. (And siblings in the Lord.) Nevertheless, when I began to consider the claims of the Catholic Church to be the Church Christ founded, he took me out to breakfast. He implied--but never quite stated--that we would not be brothers, if I sought full communion with the Catholic Church. That came true; a couple years later, I called him on his birthday, as I'd done every year for close to ten of them. He didn't recognize my number, and it was the most strained, awkward phone call I have ever had. We haven't spoken since. We were close enough that I attended the rehearsal dinner for his wedding. His wife's uncle is a Catholic priest. I remember reading a blog post of theirs, that early in their relationship, she told him of the p
My wheelchair was nearly destroyed by a car last night. That's a bit melodramatic, I suppose, because it is intact and undamaged. But we'd left my power chair ("Red Sam" in the official designation) in-between the maze of cars parked out front of Chris Yee's house for Bible Study. [Isn't that a Protestant Bible study?--ed.] They are good friends, and it is not under any official auspices. [Not BSF?--ed.] They're BSF guys, but it's not a BSF study. Anyway, I wasn't worried; I made a joke about calling the vendor the next day: "What seems to be the problem, sir?" 'Well, it was destroyed by a car.' As it happened, a guy bumped into it at slow speed. His car got the worst of it. And this only reinforces what I've said for a solid 13 years [Quickie commercial coming] If you want a power wheelchair that lasts, get a Quickie. They're fast, obviously, and they're tanks. Heck, my old one still would work, but the batteries ar