This particular situation might be confusing: two unique people, who seem to have truth from God are both preaching and baptizing. John the Baptist notices that people seem to be more drawn to Jesus. John's disciples notice, too. John the Baptist reminds them and us that he is not the Messiah, but that he was given the task of proclaiming His coming. He uses the analogy of a wedding. In our terms, John the Baptist is saying that he is the best man. The best man's job is to celebrate his friend, the groom, and to do whatever he can to help the guests celebrate and enjoy the wedding. Our culture isn't much different than theirs in this. The best man is usually the closest friend that the man getting married has in the world. Any solid best man will be thrilled for his buddy, and once it's over, his job is done. That's exactly what John the Baptist is saying. There is a fair amount of discussion about whether verses 31 through 36 is still John the Baptist talking, or ...
I admit that I enjoy raining on the parade of all these hopeful people. Because it’s not a “new kind of Christian,” it’s the same progressive crap, in a slightly more presentable package. Beto went to “church” and cleaned up his language. I don’t even grant Talarico a distinct (political) existence apart from him. I suppose it grinds my gears that we’ll have 6 years of Talarico’s smarmy nonsense, but that’s the fruit of the cult of personality for you. Obama was a huge cult of personality, but you’d have to give him and the rest of the Democrats some credit for adjusting somewhat, and not sniffing their own farts into electoral oblivion. Whether anyone Trump-adjacent can adjust is an open question. I might even grant for the sake of argument that abortion is not in the Bible. It is, plain enough that you’d have to be dense to accept intentional abortion as acceptable, but OK. I’ll go with it, for the sake of argument. Plenty of secular people can make a fine argument against it. R...