This particular situation might be confusing: two unique people, who seem to have truth from God are both preaching and baptizing. John the Baptist notices that people seem to be more drawn to Jesus. John's disciples notice, too. John the Baptist reminds them and us that he is not the Messiah, but that he was given the task of proclaiming His coming. He uses the analogy of a wedding. In our terms, John the Baptist is saying that he is the best man. The best man's job is to celebrate his friend, the groom, and to do whatever he can to help the guests celebrate and enjoy the wedding. Our culture isn't much different than theirs in this. The best man is usually the closest friend that the man getting married has in the world. Any solid best man will be thrilled for his buddy, and once it's over, his job is done. That's exactly what John the Baptist is saying. There is a fair amount of discussion about whether verses 31 through 36 is still John the Baptist talking, or ...
I actually believe in the separation of church and state. Catholics invented it. I’ll wait, while you look it up. Talarico doesn’t. On the other hand, his “church” doesn’t oppose anything that a standard progressive believes in. So he believes in a “faith” that doesn’t do much of anything to change the world or people for the better at all. We knew the fears about “Christian Nationalism” were mostly political posturing. (There are weirdos and extremists, as there always are. But people should just say they are trying to win an election, or that their faith in humanity or “God” depends on winning an election.) Isn’t that sort of pathetic? I can’t name 10 people I know who have lost faith since last Tuesday. I can easily find the opposite. By the way, institutionalized abortion, homosexuality, gender ideology and whatever else are still against the moral law. The word “institutionalized” is intentionally chosen to indicate the politics of those things.