This particular situation might be confusing: two unique people, who seem to have truth from God are both preaching and baptizing. John the Baptist notices that people seem to be more drawn to Jesus. John's disciples notice, too. John the Baptist reminds them and us that he is not the Messiah, but that he was given the task of proclaiming His coming. He uses the analogy of a wedding. In our terms, John the Baptist is saying that he is the best man. The best man's job is to celebrate his friend, the groom, and to do whatever he can to help the guests celebrate and enjoy the wedding. Our culture isn't much different than theirs in this. The best man is usually the closest friend that the man getting married has in the world. Any solid best man will be thrilled for his buddy, and once it's over, his job is done. That's exactly what John the Baptist is saying. There is a fair amount of discussion about whether verses 31 through 36 is still John the Baptist talking, or ...
Before this gets too Greek and dorky—I’m not bloody Bryan Cross anyway—let me preface this by saying that I don’t ever want to simply give a Catholic interpretation of a passage, and ask you to consider it, and then if you’re persuaded about a Catholic dogma or even all of them, that you should then become Catholic. We don’t believe in Sola Scriptura. (Please see CCC, 100 and 105) To simply become Catholic because those dogmas accord with one’s own interpretation of Scripture would be to be a Catholic on Protestant/Reformation terms. The Catholic worldview depends upon the Church, the visible, united community joined to the successor of Peter, head of the Apostles. I don’t ask you to assume that; but I think it is reasonable in faith to reach that conclusion, looking at Christian history. God and us have won that argument in hundreds of billions of hearts over two millennia. One other preface: There’s a lot of overlap between us as Christians. There should be! If there is but one ...