This particular situation might be confusing: two unique people, who seem to have truth from God are both preaching and baptizing. John the Baptist notices that people seem to be more drawn to Jesus. John's disciples notice, too. John the Baptist reminds them and us that he is not the Messiah, but that he was given the task of proclaiming His coming. He uses the analogy of a wedding. In our terms, John the Baptist is saying that he is the best man. The best man's job is to celebrate his friend, the groom, and to do whatever he can to help the guests celebrate and enjoy the wedding. Our culture isn't much different than theirs in this. The best man is usually the closest friend that the man getting married has in the world. Any solid best man will be thrilled for his buddy, and once it's over, his job is done. That's exactly what John the Baptist is saying. There is a fair amount of discussion about whether verses 31 through 36 is still John the Baptist talking, or ...
I think I could be forgiven for thinking that Christianity Today doesn’t have anything to offer me. What is an “evangelical” anyway? Personal conversion could never be dispositive of the description, because Protestants mistakenly believed that Catholicism and Orthodoxy have no such analogue. Granted, we cannot rest chiefly in a feeling, but if I have “inspirations” and “resolutions” as Escriva would call them, and I act on those in accord with the word of God, I do well. I defy anyone to hear Blessed Fulton Sheen and say he was being observant in some sterile way. “The life I live, I live to God” and “The life I live in the flesh, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me.” Galatians 2:20. You could get saved just reading or hearing that. You can’t say biblical inerrancy and infallibility is exclusively evangelical Protestant, because the Catholic Church taught it first, and still does. You can’t say that an inward testimony by the Holy Spirit belong...