Safe Haven

 I don't usually watch news; it's not well done these days. Whether because of the profit motive, or because of a subculture of rank laziness, you're not going to find a level of depth and accuracy with respect to what you need to know, or even what you would want to know, from one report. You might even find bias, in all the mediums of news delivery. Even in earlier days, when the physical newspaper was the undisputed king, the pressure to be first and the pressure to sell could distort a perspective. There are people who have made it their life's work to evaluate the news, and to attempt to re-present it--mostly by gathering as many good faith sources as possible--as fairly as possible. That is not me. I rely on much more analytical minds for that. But I did do a web search on Lindsay Clancy. You don't need my opinion on this case, and you won't get it. What you will get are a few thoughts about how our legal system is generally designed, and why it's adve...

 Fair warning: This is my favorite passage in my favorite Gospel, and St. John is my patron saint. That is, my confirmation name is John. Frankly, you could start with this text and go all the way to v. 71, and it would obviously benefit you. But I’m zooming in here because the Eucharist/Lord’s Supper is so important and is a point of disagreement between Catholics and the children of the Reformation. As always, there is a ton of overlap here, as well there should be. The glory of Jesus Christ and His love for us will come through if your heart is open. I may say some things concerning preference re: how the sacrament functions within the Catholic system, but again, questions of authority and submission are important, and are distinct from saying, “The system would be better if it had/lacked x.” I think the Magisterium or teaching office is wonderful and helpful, but only if Jesus actually put it there. If he didn’t, then quite literally, to Hell with it. Conversely, I find Protest...

 Before this gets too Greek and dorky—I’m not bloody Bryan Cross anyway—let me preface this by saying that I don’t ever want to simply give a Catholic interpretation of a passage, and ask you to consider it, and then if you’re persuaded about a Catholic dogma or even all of them, that you should then become Catholic. We don’t believe in Sola Scriptura. (Please see CCC, 100 and 105) To simply become Catholic because those dogmas accord with one’s own interpretation of Scripture would be to be a Catholic on Protestant/Reformation terms. The Catholic worldview depends upon the Church, the visible, united community joined to the successor of Peter, head of the Apostles. I don’t ask you to assume that; but I think it is reasonable in faith to reach that conclusion, looking at Christian history. God and us have won that argument in hundreds of billions of hearts over two millennia. One other preface: There’s a lot of overlap between us as Christians. There should be! If there is but one ...

 As many know, this was actually a film for TV, based on a stage play by Levinson and Link. If memory serves, the character of Lt. Columbo originated in 1962, and he was not played by Peter Falk. Columbo was played by Bert Freed. What we know as the TV series began airing in 1971, and the final episode of “classic” Columbo aired in 1978. You may have heard that ABC aired many “new” Columbo films starting in 1989, and the last aired in 2003. I have seen just a few of these, and I think they are fine, but the general consensus is that the classic ones provided the audience for the new ones. This makes sense; Columbo is on a short list of the most beloved characters in American TV and feature films. Anyway, this very first story centers around a psychiatrist “Ray Flemming” (Gene Barry) who viciously strangles his wife “Carol” (Nina Foch) because he’s been adulterous, she demanded that he stop or face divorce, and he refused. He’s also having one of his affairs with a very ill patient ...

 It’s a modern hymn written by Stuart Townsend. As a Catholic and a theologian, I feel compelled to change one line in the first stanza/verse: “The Father turns His face away.” That’s heresy. Otherwise, it’s a great hymn, much better than a lot of things that are sung at Holy Mass/Divine Liturgy. Oh, I change the line to, “I cannot turn my face away.” As difficult to see “The wages of sin is death” at the Cross, we shouldn’t want to look away. And if we’re not looking away, how much more should the Father not look away! This is the true Son with whom He is well pleased, the Son to whom he commands us to listen. We cannot eliminate the penal and substitutionary aspects completely, nor should we want to, but so-called penal substitutionary atonement seriously misunderstands sacrifice in service to the Calvinism at its root. Let’s talk about 2 Corinthians 5:21. This verse is offered by Reformed as an argument for “double imputation,” the idea that Christ takes the penalty for sin, bot...

 What if second-wave feminism and after just reduces down to abortion, and a bunch of unhappy people? What if you were an activist for most of 92 years, and nearly everything for which you advocated was bad? What would you do, if your life was a waste? Lord, have mercy! Ezekiel 33:11.

 A woman advocating for abortion is like actually installing a screen door on a submarine. Abortion is literally anti-woman. This makes a certain sense if you think about it. A lot of people doing it are pretending they don’t know what a woman even is. Olivia Rodrigo is a pop star, if you don’t know. She’s a walking, flouncing performative contradiction, if you ask me, because her appeal is largely based in creating the desire in men to copulate with her. Let me know when “Let’s have sex and then kill the baby!” starts making sense. Meanwhile, Rodrigo spearheaded an abortion-celebrating music festival. Nothing says “girl power” like murdering all the girls.

 If a person tries to enter the US more than once, that illegal entry becomes a felony. Even taking into account “felony creep,” we don’t have to allow felons to stay here. I think Stephen Miller is a web troll with political power. I think Donald Trump’s entire political career is at best, a waste. Even adding in the Republican conflation of crime with immigration, the Democrats pretend that Donald Trump is essentially the only criminal. And I do mean only. Some may forget “Defund The Police” but I don’t.

 It always had a deep resonance for me, because the Huxtables were an intact family with generations of that fidelity and love. And yes, it’s TV, and human beings are sinners, but it wouldn’t resonate if it were completely unrealistic. Bill Cosby’s own sins have damaged the images he left us, these symbols that the whole cast created together. But there must be a thirst for virtue. Pretended goodness will appeal, but we all thirst for it, because we keep gravitating toward it, even in our stories.

 Fair warning: Tom Segura is a crude comedian, and he uses words I don’t even use in a flare of some passion. Nevertheless, I find him really funny. I think most people know who Joe Rogan is, but if not, he hosts the most popular podcast in the world. He’s also a commentator for the Ultimate Fighting Championship, UFC for short, which is the top level of mixed martial arts (MMA for short). It’s probably risen to prominence because of corruption in boxing. I digress. Tom Segura has a funny bit about the difference between watching his own sons, versus the two girls his cousin has. At the time, both sets of kids were the same age, 6 and 3. He says in part: “(OMG), what did I do wrong, to not get girls?…They’re like, ‘Hello, Uncle Tommy.’ And I say, ‘Hello to you.’…I could go in that room an hour later and they’re like [impersonation of little girls coloring and smiling]…My boys aren’t like that…real “he/hims”, if you know what I’m saying. Don’t worry, we asked them. [Segura kind of s...