Skip to main content
Previous posts on feminism now lead me here: to say just where feminism has been a credit, and where possibly the body of Christ has allowed its witness to be marred by cultural concerns. I do not do this lightly. I am well aware how fashionable it is to criticize the church. Any time a Christian speaks of the church, he or she should speak with respect and love, as these are the people Jesus loved (and loves) so much that he died for them, and will return for them again. So much hostility toward the church masquerades as a kind of prophetic correction that is nothing more than self-guilt somebody wants to share with the whole body of Christ. That's a post for another day. When I wonder about feminism and how to assess it, I ask one question: "Is there anything true about what is being said?" That question is the essence of seeing Christ in culture, which is not only a point of view or a disposition, but the first part of making all things captive to the Lordship of Christ. My understanding of this is beautifully summed up by St. Patrick when he wrote, "Christ in hearts of all that love me, Christ in mouth of friend and stranger." There is considerable value in shedding light on sexual harrassment in the workplace, violence against women, pornography, (though many feminist groups ally themselves politically with those unwilling to agree that it is degrading to women) and glass ceilings in corporate settings. Our political culture purposely pits feminists against men by excusing the vulgarity of men, lack of respect, inability to communicate, (especially emotionally) and anger as part of being a man. Utter hogwash. Sadder still, men who demonstrate the ability to listen, compassion, etc. are said to have found their "feminine" side. No, what they have found is a Christ-like side. Feminists can no more claim good qualities as part of a woman's nature than men claim bad ones as an excuse. Men unwilling to confront their own weaknesses often complain that women "want it both ways." They are absolutely right. Toughness and sensitivity. Courage and vulnerability. Willingness to fight, and yet die. "Wow. Sounds like the greatest man ever!" Right again. I've just described Jesus. For the church, then, certain feminists who have blamed the Christian church and all of our parents (led by our dads) for 'patriarchy' (all-purpose word that used to benignly denote male leadership that now means "All things men do that feminists hate") have been wasting your time. One can tear down every structure of Western society, domesticate men in every way possible, strip them of all power, dignity and respect, and they'll still be brutish, insensitive pigs. If I am in any way representative, then that is a guarantee. Beware, dear friends, of those who like to pretend that things were perfect here in America before the feminists showed up and started complaining. Those men are just as willing to ignore themselves as anyone. They are no friends of ours, either. As some have asserted, the church is its own body politic. And that is a good thing, because in terms of pursuing equality, peace, and reconciliation, the American body politic is a rotting corpse.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

We Don't Need No Magisterium: (Jason's Version) (But Actually, We Do)

Hilarious Com-Box Quote of The Day: "I was caught immediately because it is the Acts of the Apostles, not the Acts of the Holy Spirit Acting Erratically."--Donald Todd, reacting to the inartful opposition of the Holy Spirit and the Magisterium. Mark Galli, an editor at Christianity Today, had suggested that today's "confusion" in evangelicalism replicates a confusion on the day of Pentecost. Mr. Todd commented after this reply , and the original article is here. My thoughts: By what means was this Church-less "consensus" formed? If the Council did not possess the authority to adjudicate such questions, who does? If the Council Fathers did not intend to be the arbiters, why do they say that they do? At the risk of being rude, I would define evangelicalism as, "Whatever I want or need to believe at any particular time." Ecclesial authority to settle a particular question is a step forward, but only as long as, "God alone is Lord of the con...

Dear Alyse

 Today, you’re 35. Or at least you would be, in this place. You probably know this, but we’re OK. Not great, but OK. We know you wouldn’t want us moping around and weeping all the time. We try not to. Actually, I guess part of the problem is that you didn’t know how much we loved you. And that you didn’t know how to love yourself. I hope you have gotten to Love by now. Not a place, but fills everything in every way. I’m not Him, but he probably said, “Dear daughter/sister, you have been terribly hard on yourself. Rest now, and be at peace.” Anyway, teaching is going well, and I tell the kids all about you. They all say you are pretty. I usually can keep the boys from saying something gross for a few seconds. Mom and I are going to the game tonight. And like 6 more times, before I go back to South Carolina. I have seen Nicky twice, but I myself haven’t seen your younger kids. Bob took pictures of the day we said goodbye, and we did a family picture at the Abbey. I literally almost a...

Who Is Out Here Having Sex And Children With People They Don’t Like?

 And look, I’m not married. I’ve never been married. I have no children. I didn’t choose that; things just worked out that way. If you must know, I haven’t had sexual intercourse either. I probably should say “coitus,” so I am not arguing with some progressive activist about what “sexual intercourse” means. But I figured out from influencer videos or something what a “dead bedroom” was. Unless a couple mutually agrees that they don’t want to have sex/coitus anymore (hopefully to pray and serve) this is usually bad. I’ve known enough couples that it’s probably an indicator of trouble, especially for couples who are still able to have children. Is it really that wild to at least hope that Mr. and Mrs. Vance love each other? That a fourth child yet born at least might indicate that they enjoy each other?  Children are definitely not responsible for their parents’ happiness. That’s absolutely true. But wouldn’t any child hope their parents were happy, when they came into being? As...