I saw a couple things on Facebook that got me thinking today: One of my friends noted that she will have been "with child" for about half the time she's been married. Wow. Someone give her a hand! I mean, help her out! How To Tell You're An Actual Catholic: Your first reaction to this story is, "No way they're artificially contracepting, and that's great!" (Her husband was my neighbor in college; they're quite devout Protestants.) I hope if I am called to marriage that I learn to put my wife's needs before my desires, because there is no selfish sex, properly speaking, and blessings definitely come! Both possible states fill me with unmitigated terror, but I would much prefer the terror shared with a mate than consecrated celibacy terror. Consecrated celibacy terror also comes with the, "I don't even like these people" terror, the "Dude, seriously, more school" terror, and the "Pretty robes, captive audience, and they still ignore me" terror. I have been told I'd be a great addition to the clergy, and this may be true. However, so proud a man as me should be nowhere near a title of any consequence. Moreover, most people who say this must not have heard me say that I need celibacy like I need a hole in my head. Go on, laugh. I'm serious. No one is less equipped for this than me. I think, Catholic Church, that we're so sinful that we often tell every young with actual faith to become a priest, maybe to feel less bad about ourselves. Don't feel too bad; the separated brethren do the same thing to their young men. [But at least we don't require celibacy of ours.--ed.] True enough. But let me be honest here: Looking back on it, I went to seminary as a Protestant on the strength of pride; first, someone else's, then my own. I may well have gifts of preaching or teaching and the like, but that's not enough.
Secondly, I saw a guy that had argued vehemently in defense of the HHS mandate (and abortion) post another adorable picture of a kitty that was likely to meet its doom if we didn't hurry up and adopt him. That's like the 10th one this month. At the risk of snark, this is rich. I love cats. And dogs. And most other creatures. BUT I LOVE PEOPLE infinitely more. As well I (and everybody else) should. Even if people have all kinds of sex in morally dubious circumstances, every life is precious and important. Even if those two people don't see it or care. This is why the "What if the situation is horrible" arguments are stupid: it's always better to exist than not. Duh. This is why suicide is wrong; the value of a life is not subjectively, qualitatively determined. The goodness of a life is not determined by the absence of suffering. If it is, I've had a really, really, bad life. I'm not even special in that; I'm just saying. Cue the Reagan.
Secondly, I saw a guy that had argued vehemently in defense of the HHS mandate (and abortion) post another adorable picture of a kitty that was likely to meet its doom if we didn't hurry up and adopt him. That's like the 10th one this month. At the risk of snark, this is rich. I love cats. And dogs. And most other creatures. BUT I LOVE PEOPLE infinitely more. As well I (and everybody else) should. Even if people have all kinds of sex in morally dubious circumstances, every life is precious and important. Even if those two people don't see it or care. This is why the "What if the situation is horrible" arguments are stupid: it's always better to exist than not. Duh. This is why suicide is wrong; the value of a life is not subjectively, qualitatively determined. The goodness of a life is not determined by the absence of suffering. If it is, I've had a really, really, bad life. I'm not even special in that; I'm just saying. Cue the Reagan.
Comments