Skip to main content
I can honestly say with a clear conscience, I knew it. I saw it coming. After the last home run to make it 6-0, knocking Cardinals co-ace Adam Wainwright out of the game, I just knew. These people are too excited. They don't know how this works. It was only the third inning. Teams that don't have "it" may fold in deciding games; the defending champs will not. On the one hand, a new year is different; commentators make too much of one team's history at times like this. On the other, this team is the same team that made the highly improbable run to the title last year, coming from behind five times in World Series Game 6. Two outs and two strikes in the final inning is old hat, as well.

I said in published writing that the 2012 Cardinals would be better than the team that had just won it all; in all measures, they were better. But this team has a frustrating tendency to lose tight, well-played, (read: one run) games. The addition of the second wild card spot in each league provided another opportunity to qualify for the postseason, since the enjoyable and talented Atlanta Braves took the first wild card, after falling just short of their division title to the upstart Washington Nationals, who had the National League's best record. So here were the Cardinals, having largely outplayed these kids from Washington, but still pushed to this fifth and deciding game by their as-yet-not-fatal flaw, trailing big on the road, facing a pitcher who won 21 games, and is consequently a finalist for the league's Cy Young Award.

And yet.

Fans call it "chipping away." You fall down big early in a game with lots of time. Players and fans will tell you that you must resist the urge to try to get it all back at once.

The Cardinals started chipping. They had runners all over the bases. In fact, they could have--and maybe should have--tied the game in the 5th inning. Two runs that inning. A missed opportunity in the sixth. One in the seventh. And here the game stood, 6-4 in the Cardinals' 8th when .250 hitter and backup infielder Daniel Descalso golfed a change-up into the seats to make it 6-5. But they didn't tie it that inning. In fact, the Nationals added a run in the eighth. The game stood 7-5 in the final inning when the Nationals closing pitcher retired 2 Cardinals to put them on the brink.

When the lore of this game and team are written, no matter the result, people must and will say that Yadier Molina and World Series hero David Freese took two of the greatest at-bats in baseball history, against the twelve toughest pitches I've ever seen. They didn't get hits, mind you. But they earned walks.

And naturally, the bases were loaded again for Descalso. What do you think happened? He hit a rocket to second base off the shortstop's glove that squirted into short center field to tie the score.

There are always moments that define championship-level teams and seasons. Like last year, the Cardinals got reinforced by players added to the mix. When it works, teams gel. They click. Three guys have done this for the Cardinals: Cardinals ace pitcher Chris Carpenter, who improbably returned from "season-ending" shoulder surgery in September. Of course he did. Edward Mujica, acquired in trade from the Miami Marlins, who had been sporting an earned-run average above 4.00 with Miami, has surrendered less than a run per 9 innings since coming to the Cardinals. Of course he has. And the third member of this triad was only here because hitting star Rafael Furcal was severely injured earlier. Just a minor-leaguer, getting a fortunate shot. And the rookie Pete Kozma drove in the winning runs. Of course he did.

How prescient do I look now, dear reader? The Cardinals and Giants will fight for the National League pennant. The Yankees are lurking. Every team left in this tournament in fact is better than the Cardinals, on paper. But that means about as much to them as a six-run deficit in a deciding game in the opponent's home park. Absolutely nothing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My Thoughts On The Harrison Butker Commencement Speech

Update: I read the whole thing. I’m sorry, but what a weirdo. I thought you [Tom Darrow, of Denver, CO] made a trenchant case for why lockdowns are bad, and I definitely appreciated it. But a graduation speech is *not* the place for that. Secondly, this is an august event. It always is. I would never address the President of the United States in this manner. Never. Even the previous president, though he deserves it, if anyone does. Thirdly, the affirmations of Catholic identity should be more general. He has no authority to propound with specificity on all matters of great consequence. It has all the hallmarks of a culture war broadside, and again, a layman shouldn’t speak like this. The respect and reverence due the clergy is *always due,* even if they are weak, and outright wrong. We just don’t brush them aside like corrupt Mafia dons, to make a point. Fourthly, I don’t know where anyone gets the idea that the TLM is how God demands to be worshipped. The Church doesn’t teach that. ...

Dear Alyse

 Today, you’re 35. Or at least you would be, in this place. You probably know this, but we’re OK. Not great, but OK. We know you wouldn’t want us moping around and weeping all the time. We try not to. Actually, I guess part of the problem is that you didn’t know how much we loved you. And that you didn’t know how to love yourself. I hope you have gotten to Love by now. Not a place, but fills everything in every way. I’m not Him, but he probably said, “Dear daughter/sister, you have been terribly hard on yourself. Rest now, and be at peace.” Anyway, teaching is going well, and I tell the kids all about you. They all say you are pretty. I usually can keep the boys from saying something gross for a few seconds. Mom and I are going to the game tonight. And like 6 more times, before I go back to South Carolina. I have seen Nicky twice, but I myself haven’t seen your younger kids. Bob took pictures of the day we said goodbye, and we did a family picture at the Abbey. I literally almost a...

A Friend I Once Had, And The Dogmatic Principle

 I once had a friend, a dear friend, who helped me with personal care needs in college. Reformed Presbyterian to the core. When I was a Reformed Presbyterian, I visited their church many times. We were close. I still consider his siblings my friends. (And siblings in the Lord.) Nevertheless, when I began to consider the claims of the Catholic Church to be the Church Christ founded, he took me out to breakfast. He implied--but never quite stated--that we would not be brothers, if I sought full communion with the Catholic Church. That came true; a couple years later, I called him on his birthday, as I'd done every year for close to ten of them. He didn't recognize my number, and it was the most strained, awkward phone call I have ever had. We haven't spoken since. We were close enough that I attended the rehearsal dinner for his wedding. His wife's uncle is a Catholic priest. I remember reading a blog post of theirs, that early in their relationship, she told him of the p...