I'm praying as I type this. I'm sure you are aware that this desire is the strongest natural one we have. And that is an unqualified good, insofar as it would prevent the extinction of the human race, among other things. But people often express this desire in all manner of destructive ways, and at the wrong times. You don't need the details, I'm sure.
And I'll just tell you, I've gone about as wrong as you can, while still not bringing lives to ruin. Often in the spiritual life, you learn more from failing than from succeeding. Which is not to say it is better to fail. I mean only that the special humility that shame often produces is good for those who would be proud.
I think the failure to distinguish concupiscence from sin has the undesirable effect of completely obliterating the distinction between temptation and sin in the sphere of sexuality in practical (Protestant) life. Aside from the dumb things I actually did, I felt bad for every desire I ever had, every thought.
Anyway, the cross of singleness is much different as a Catholic. I've had time to reflect on that cross some more. By God's grace, I can see that the generalized agitation I described as "longing for marriage" in those days--and even after--were the after-effects of having given expression to my disordered passions! As I'm thinking about it today, let me say it boldly: there is no such thing as a generalized sexual "frustration" that is good. If you feel this, (men, especially) it's probably a disordered passion.
I'm not saying there isn't a good way to long for marriage. But first, we have to see that our sexual desire when rightly expressed or realized is for one person. That desire says, "You, and only you." A person could express his or her sexual desire with lots of people, but it won't be a good thing, and it won't come to its full flowering in God's plan.
And you can't just say this. I could be blathering on pointlessly about purity and desiring to do God's will while knowing nothing of this self-possession that we're talking about here. But I understand, today, by experience that my sexual self is mine to give as a gift. It's extremely powerful. I have already known that. It's dangerous; it subsumes things (and people). If and when God chooses to make life suitable for me to give this gift, it will be a beautiful thing. I'm sure if it were recounted, those books would move the world. But there's too much sharing of that stuff, anyway.
I'm quite the appreciator of women. They are so fascinating, even were they not desirable to me in this way. God was really up to something in this case. [You're attracted to every woman.--ed.] Not true! Most of them, maybe. But the point I want to make is that we should look for signs of something more than just attraction to know that our time for marriage has arrived. That God is doing something, in other words. I do wonder what God's idea is, if marriage is in my future. Will I give the world a saint? A president? A world-class chemist? If the inevitably explosive love between my future spouse and me were just a footnote because my children brought glory to God and good to humanity, what more could I ask?
And I'll just tell you, I've gone about as wrong as you can, while still not bringing lives to ruin. Often in the spiritual life, you learn more from failing than from succeeding. Which is not to say it is better to fail. I mean only that the special humility that shame often produces is good for those who would be proud.
I think the failure to distinguish concupiscence from sin has the undesirable effect of completely obliterating the distinction between temptation and sin in the sphere of sexuality in practical (Protestant) life. Aside from the dumb things I actually did, I felt bad for every desire I ever had, every thought.
Anyway, the cross of singleness is much different as a Catholic. I've had time to reflect on that cross some more. By God's grace, I can see that the generalized agitation I described as "longing for marriage" in those days--and even after--were the after-effects of having given expression to my disordered passions! As I'm thinking about it today, let me say it boldly: there is no such thing as a generalized sexual "frustration" that is good. If you feel this, (men, especially) it's probably a disordered passion.
I'm not saying there isn't a good way to long for marriage. But first, we have to see that our sexual desire when rightly expressed or realized is for one person. That desire says, "You, and only you." A person could express his or her sexual desire with lots of people, but it won't be a good thing, and it won't come to its full flowering in God's plan.
And you can't just say this. I could be blathering on pointlessly about purity and desiring to do God's will while knowing nothing of this self-possession that we're talking about here. But I understand, today, by experience that my sexual self is mine to give as a gift. It's extremely powerful. I have already known that. It's dangerous; it subsumes things (and people). If and when God chooses to make life suitable for me to give this gift, it will be a beautiful thing. I'm sure if it were recounted, those books would move the world. But there's too much sharing of that stuff, anyway.
I'm quite the appreciator of women. They are so fascinating, even were they not desirable to me in this way. God was really up to something in this case. [You're attracted to every woman.--ed.] Not true! Most of them, maybe. But the point I want to make is that we should look for signs of something more than just attraction to know that our time for marriage has arrived. That God is doing something, in other words. I do wonder what God's idea is, if marriage is in my future. Will I give the world a saint? A president? A world-class chemist? If the inevitably explosive love between my future spouse and me were just a footnote because my children brought glory to God and good to humanity, what more could I ask?
Comments