I don't find it ironic that Leithart's prosecutor is now Catholic. If you talk to him, it makes perfect sense. Jason Stellman has always been an ecclesial Christian; that is, his faith has always been a faith received. Once you make that decision, and investigate it to the end, the Catholic Church is inevitable. If you purge that highly ecclesial sensibility of the random individualist elements, (like Sola Scriptura) Mother Church is all that remains. Let's just be blunt: Leithart is a more perfect fundamentalist; he's read a lot of books, and he's got buckets of sympathy for the Church, at least insofar as it serves to obscure the central truth: he is his own arbiter of what counts as divine revelation.
R. Scott Clark has roundly criticized the Federal Vision for being out of accord with traditional Reformed theology; he's right. But people like Rich Lusk have pointed out that the story with the sacraments has never been as stark as Clark says. He's right, too. And here's the kicker: this is evidence for the claim that the Catholic Church is the Church that Christ founded. Would you not expect two communities that were once one to share affinities? Lusk says, "Look back here! We share affinities!" But there are reasons why we are not one. Clark is there to remind people of those things. That is, Clark represents that which defines itself in opposition to the Catholic Church. In a way, he should. That's why those communities were founded in the first place.
I breathed deeply of that FV air, and I can tell you that most of them don't realize the ecclesial implications of what they say. They have recovered something of Catholic truth without knowing this is what they have done. They earnestly believe they have recovered an authentic charism of God from within their tradition. They're right. Something has to give. You either pretend that trans-communal theological continuity isn't an authentic work of the Holy Spirit, or you ignore the ecclesial implications of having recognized it, by making the Church invisible. Or, you become Catholic. If you become Catholic, you can recognize the work of the Holy Spirit outside the Church, AND recognize the visible, ecclesial implications of it. LG, 8.
Come home, Rich. We have what you're looking for. James and Peter, we have what you're looking for, too. God already thought of your insights, and he gave them as treasures to the Catholic Church. Dr. Clark, does it really seem reasonable that Jesus Christ left His brothers in darkness until 1517?
R. Scott Clark has roundly criticized the Federal Vision for being out of accord with traditional Reformed theology; he's right. But people like Rich Lusk have pointed out that the story with the sacraments has never been as stark as Clark says. He's right, too. And here's the kicker: this is evidence for the claim that the Catholic Church is the Church that Christ founded. Would you not expect two communities that were once one to share affinities? Lusk says, "Look back here! We share affinities!" But there are reasons why we are not one. Clark is there to remind people of those things. That is, Clark represents that which defines itself in opposition to the Catholic Church. In a way, he should. That's why those communities were founded in the first place.
I breathed deeply of that FV air, and I can tell you that most of them don't realize the ecclesial implications of what they say. They have recovered something of Catholic truth without knowing this is what they have done. They earnestly believe they have recovered an authentic charism of God from within their tradition. They're right. Something has to give. You either pretend that trans-communal theological continuity isn't an authentic work of the Holy Spirit, or you ignore the ecclesial implications of having recognized it, by making the Church invisible. Or, you become Catholic. If you become Catholic, you can recognize the work of the Holy Spirit outside the Church, AND recognize the visible, ecclesial implications of it. LG, 8.
Come home, Rich. We have what you're looking for. James and Peter, we have what you're looking for, too. God already thought of your insights, and he gave them as treasures to the Catholic Church. Dr. Clark, does it really seem reasonable that Jesus Christ left His brothers in darkness until 1517?
Comments