Skip to main content

Read It Like This: Basic Principles Of The Social Doctrine

The basis of the social doctrine, its very heart, is the dignity of the human person made in the image of God. The basis of that dignity is man's intended end, which is communion with God. So, there are a few concepts within the social doctrine we will need to bear in mind, if we are to understand Laudato Si, since Pope Francis has added it to the social doctrine of the Church. Other theologians remind us that the principles of the social doctrine are not articulated in a vacuum; we must apply them contextually.

Justice: To give to another person what he or she is due.

Common good: The sum of all the conditions necessary for each person to reach their end.

Solidarity: A firm and persevering determination to commit oneself to the common good. (Not simply a vague feeling of compassion)

Social Justice: That which tends to the preservation of social groups dedicated to the common good, and to the good of all the members within that/those groups.

Subsidiarity: A firm determination to assist people at lower levels of social organization by those at a higher level, without depriving those people of the right to handle matters within their competence. In  practical terms, we handle problems at the lowest level possible.

If we keep these basic definitions in mind, we won't read Laudato Si through other lenses, and hopefully therefore avoid becoming angry that the pope is supporting a political ideology we dislike. The application of the social doctrine is necessarily political in some secondary sense, because politics concerns the social organization of people. Anything in human life that hinders people from finding communion with God is of potential concern to the Church.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dear Alyse

 Today, you’re 35. Or at least you would be, in this place. You probably know this, but we’re OK. Not great, but OK. We know you wouldn’t want us moping around and weeping all the time. We try not to. Actually, I guess part of the problem is that you didn’t know how much we loved you. And that you didn’t know how to love yourself. I hope you have gotten to Love by now. Not a place, but fills everything in every way. I’m not Him, but he probably said, “Dear daughter/sister, you have been terribly hard on yourself. Rest now, and be at peace.” Anyway, teaching is going well, and I tell the kids all about you. They all say you are pretty. I usually can keep the boys from saying something gross for a few seconds. Mom and I are going to the game tonight. And like 6 more times, before I go back to South Carolina. I have seen Nicky twice, but I myself haven’t seen your younger kids. Bob took pictures of the day we said goodbye, and we did a family picture at the Abbey. I literally almost a...

We Don't Need No Magisterium: (Jason's Version) (But Actually, We Do)

Hilarious Com-Box Quote of The Day: "I was caught immediately because it is the Acts of the Apostles, not the Acts of the Holy Spirit Acting Erratically."--Donald Todd, reacting to the inartful opposition of the Holy Spirit and the Magisterium. Mark Galli, an editor at Christianity Today, had suggested that today's "confusion" in evangelicalism replicates a confusion on the day of Pentecost. Mr. Todd commented after this reply , and the original article is here. My thoughts: By what means was this Church-less "consensus" formed? If the Council did not possess the authority to adjudicate such questions, who does? If the Council Fathers did not intend to be the arbiters, why do they say that they do? At the risk of being rude, I would define evangelicalism as, "Whatever I want or need to believe at any particular time." Ecclesial authority to settle a particular question is a step forward, but only as long as, "God alone is Lord of the con...

My Thoughts On The Harrison Butker Commencement Speech

Update: I read the whole thing. I’m sorry, but what a weirdo. I thought you [Tom Darrow, of Denver, CO] made a trenchant case for why lockdowns are bad, and I definitely appreciated it. But a graduation speech is *not* the place for that. Secondly, this is an august event. It always is. I would never address the President of the United States in this manner. Never. Even the previous president, though he deserves it, if anyone does. Thirdly, the affirmations of Catholic identity should be more general. He has no authority to propound with specificity on all matters of great consequence. It has all the hallmarks of a culture war broadside, and again, a layman shouldn’t speak like this. The respect and reverence due the clergy is *always due,* even if they are weak, and outright wrong. We just don’t brush them aside like corrupt Mafia dons, to make a point. Fourthly, I don’t know where anyone gets the idea that the TLM is how God demands to be worshipped. The Church doesn’t teach that. ...