Of course, they blocked this attempt to protect infants who survive abortions. Let's set aside the anger over this, and think about it from their perspective (Shocking, I know). First, a few facts:
1. Most Republicans know that Human Life Amendments proposed in Congress are DOA right now, no matter how great the GOP does in any election, or how many members they have;
2. A pro-life politician's only effectual option is to chip away, not only at the right itself, but at the ideas that make it seem reasonable. That is, s/he knows he is working incrementally;
3. The pro-choice advocates and their elected representatives believe that the GOP is in fact working incrementally against the right to choose abortion;
4. Both sides fundamentally agree with respect to what the GOP is doing; [(2) and (3)]
5. Therefore, it is fundamentally dishonest for a pro-life lawmaker to claim, "This is not about abortion," as Sen. Ernst did.
The only honest answer to, "He's trying to undermine the right to choose!" is, "You're right."
This is why I'll never be elected.
1. Most Republicans know that Human Life Amendments proposed in Congress are DOA right now, no matter how great the GOP does in any election, or how many members they have;
2. A pro-life politician's only effectual option is to chip away, not only at the right itself, but at the ideas that make it seem reasonable. That is, s/he knows he is working incrementally;
3. The pro-choice advocates and their elected representatives believe that the GOP is in fact working incrementally against the right to choose abortion;
4. Both sides fundamentally agree with respect to what the GOP is doing; [(2) and (3)]
5. Therefore, it is fundamentally dishonest for a pro-life lawmaker to claim, "This is not about abortion," as Sen. Ernst did.
The only honest answer to, "He's trying to undermine the right to choose!" is, "You're right."
This is why I'll never be elected.
Comments