Skip to main content

Romney

I watched his speech, announcing his impeachment vote. I loved it. I thought and felt everything he said. Romney is right. And it's this steadfast decency that is so out of place today. Many people have reconciled themselves to Trump, and defend him to the point of celebration. That's not the GOP I believe in. I'm not kidding when I say I'd rather lose than fight dirty. And I should rather die than compromise myself. Which of the two men is closer to the martyrs? C'mon, you know the answer.

It's also true that various left-leaning media and commentators now bestow upon Romney Strange New Respect, as we call it. That's what we call it when a Republican does something that hurts another Republican, or helps the Democrats in the short term. We know their praise is short-lived, and so does Sen. Romney. The key point here is, however, that Romney does not control the reactions and motivations of others. He stated his motives clearly, and I definitely believe him. And for those of you who think it was an act, and that he has something to gain, I would reply that I remember how stiff and awkward he was in speeches. He's not a good actor. Truthfully, he's a kind-hearted, out-of-touch-in-the-best-way dork, for lack of a better term. And what is there to gain? He may even lose his Senate seat in 2024, since there are so many people now professing to be ashamed that they voted for him. The braying masses, who are playing such an intense game of Follow the Leader that they can't remember how they called Obama's following a "personality cult." It would be funny, if it weren't so sad.

In fairness, Romney's doing penance, for praising Trump in the run-up to 2012. He's trying to make up for the "47 percent" comment, and for taking a hard line on immigration, in order to shore up his base in that election. He's a hard-liner in nothing, except decency.

Romney hearkens back to Eisenhower, to the Bushes, and to some aspects of Reagan. Broadly acceptable Republicans, who struck fear into the Democrats without debasing us and themselves. Now people just call him a "loser." If only I could be a loser like that!

It's true that you'll never get anywhere chasing the approval of Democrats and the media. It's true that opposing abortion will get you pilloried by these same people. It's true that they never apologize, never surrender, and will do almost anything to win. It's also true that Christian voters should understand and accept persecution for the sake of righteousness. Now, they seemingly fight with no righteousness at all.

Romney isn't the best vessel to teach us this, but it seems almost perverse to say it that way. Christians have convinced themselves that the head of a new kakistocracy is King Cyrus. Frankly, I'm dizzy from the astonishing lack of perspective.

In any case, thank you, Senator Romney. I'd be honored to vote for you again.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hilarious Com-Box Quote of The Day: "I was caught immediately because it is the Acts of the Apostles, not the Acts of the Holy Spirit Acting Erratically."--Donald Todd, reacting to the inartful opposition of the Holy Spirit and the Magisterium. Mark Galli, an editor at Christianity Today, had suggested that today's "confusion" in evangelicalism replicates a confusion on the day of Pentecost. Mr. Todd commented after this reply , and the original article is here. My thoughts: By what means was this Church-less "consensus" formed? If the Council did not possess the authority to adjudicate such questions, who does? If the Council Fathers did not intend to be the arbiters, why do they say that they do? At the risk of being rude, I would define evangelicalism as, "Whatever I want or need to believe at any particular time." Ecclesial authority to settle a particular question is a step forward, but only as long as, "God alone is Lord of the con

A Friend I Once Had, And The Dogmatic Principle

 I once had a friend, a dear friend, who helped me with personal care needs in college. Reformed Presbyterian to the core. When I was a Reformed Presbyterian, I visited their church many times. We were close. I still consider his siblings my friends. (And siblings in the Lord.) Nevertheless, when I began to consider the claims of the Catholic Church to be the Church Christ founded, he took me out to breakfast. He implied--but never quite stated--that we would not be brothers, if I sought full communion with the Catholic Church. That came true; a couple years later, I called him on his birthday, as I'd done every year for close to ten of them. He didn't recognize my number, and it was the most strained, awkward phone call I have ever had. We haven't spoken since. We were close enough that I attended the rehearsal dinner for his wedding. His wife's uncle is a Catholic priest. I remember reading a blog post of theirs, that early in their relationship, she told him of the p
My wheelchair was nearly destroyed by a car last night. That's a bit melodramatic, I suppose, because it is intact and undamaged. But we'd left my power chair ("Red Sam" in the official designation) in-between the maze of cars parked out front of Chris Yee's house for Bible Study. [Isn't that a Protestant Bible study?--ed.] They are good friends, and it is not under any official auspices. [Not BSF?--ed.] They're BSF guys, but it's not a BSF study. Anyway, I wasn't worried; I made a joke about calling the vendor the next day: "What seems to be the problem, sir?" 'Well, it was destroyed by a car.' As it happened, a guy bumped into it at slow speed. His car got the worst of it. And this only reinforces what I've said for a solid 13 years [Quickie commercial coming] If you want a power wheelchair that lasts, get a Quickie. They're fast, obviously, and they're tanks. Heck, my old one still would work, but the batteries ar