Skip to main content

I May Well Be "Tedious"

I could read 30 columns all criticizing Donald Trump. He doesn't become more acceptable to me as time passes. In fact, one of the things I promised to myself is that I would never stop being angry in some form about the things which ought to make a person of good conscience angry. That's the danger in the politics game: you've got your side, and as long as either your side is winning, or the other side is as appallingly bad as they've always been, you feel the pressure to ignore or overlook wrong things from your own side.

The grisly reality of abortion, and the damage of the sexual revolution still doesn't go away. I can't join the opposition, because the opposition believes in the tenets of the sexual revolution. It's difficult, because I do believe the government is supposed to be a force for good, to actually regulate the exchange of goods and services for the sake of the common good. I'm not on the Right, precisely because I believe the common good exists, and is more than simply a collection of private goods. We should apply the ethics of believing that we're all in this together to the exchange of goods and services, and to the role of government, and to the protection of the vulnerable innocent.

Yet I do long for the day when the president of the United States again behaves presidentially. We're going to need a replacement for that to happen. It doesn't mean that I want anything bad to happen to Donald Trump. It doesn't mean that I agree completely with AOC. It does mean that if the rest of the country decides to use Joe Biden as a palate cleanser, I'm not standing in the way. Furthermore, I will be in fervent prayer concerning Joe Biden's opinions and actionable political beliefs regarding the sexual revolution. You'll forgive me though, if I can't bring myself to be upset, if and when he wins.

What is a "bad" president? I think the quickest and easiest way to be a bad president is to be a bad person. I think this despite whatever individual opinions I may have on the prudential issues of the day. With respect to the definition I just provided, I think the best president in the last 50 years is perhaps Jimmy Carter. The economy wasn't good, and the Iran hostage crisis didn't work out to Carter's benefit politically, but there is nobody in this country that looks at President Carter today with malice in his heart, or maybe not even a negative thought. On the issues of taxes or guns, or whatever we usually judge presidents by, the issues fade with time. But did he bring us together when he had the chance? When we had a crisis far beyond any of our abilities, did he say words that let us know we would be OK? Did he ever make us embarrassed to be citizens of our own country?

I might choose to vote with different criteria, and you might as well. But for me, character counts the most. I will not apologize for believing that, and for acting upon it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

We Don't Need No Magisterium: (Jason's Version) (But Actually, We Do)

Hilarious Com-Box Quote of The Day: "I was caught immediately because it is the Acts of the Apostles, not the Acts of the Holy Spirit Acting Erratically."--Donald Todd, reacting to the inartful opposition of the Holy Spirit and the Magisterium. Mark Galli, an editor at Christianity Today, had suggested that today's "confusion" in evangelicalism replicates a confusion on the day of Pentecost. Mr. Todd commented after this reply , and the original article is here. My thoughts: By what means was this Church-less "consensus" formed? If the Council did not possess the authority to adjudicate such questions, who does? If the Council Fathers did not intend to be the arbiters, why do they say that they do? At the risk of being rude, I would define evangelicalism as, "Whatever I want or need to believe at any particular time." Ecclesial authority to settle a particular question is a step forward, but only as long as, "God alone is Lord of the con...

Dear Alyse

 Today, you’re 35. Or at least you would be, in this place. You probably know this, but we’re OK. Not great, but OK. We know you wouldn’t want us moping around and weeping all the time. We try not to. Actually, I guess part of the problem is that you didn’t know how much we loved you. And that you didn’t know how to love yourself. I hope you have gotten to Love by now. Not a place, but fills everything in every way. I’m not Him, but he probably said, “Dear daughter/sister, you have been terribly hard on yourself. Rest now, and be at peace.” Anyway, teaching is going well, and I tell the kids all about you. They all say you are pretty. I usually can keep the boys from saying something gross for a few seconds. Mom and I are going to the game tonight. And like 6 more times, before I go back to South Carolina. I have seen Nicky twice, but I myself haven’t seen your younger kids. Bob took pictures of the day we said goodbye, and we did a family picture at the Abbey. I literally almost a...

Who Is Out Here Having Sex And Children With People They Don’t Like?

 And look, I’m not married. I’ve never been married. I have no children. I didn’t choose that; things just worked out that way. If you must know, I haven’t had sexual intercourse either. I probably should say “coitus,” so I am not arguing with some progressive activist about what “sexual intercourse” means. But I figured out from influencer videos or something what a “dead bedroom” was. Unless a couple mutually agrees that they don’t want to have sex/coitus anymore (hopefully to pray and serve) this is usually bad. I’ve known enough couples that it’s probably an indicator of trouble, especially for couples who are still able to have children. Is it really that wild to at least hope that Mr. and Mrs. Vance love each other? That a fourth child yet born at least might indicate that they enjoy each other?  Children are definitely not responsible for their parents’ happiness. That’s absolutely true. But wouldn’t any child hope their parents were happy, when they came into being? As...