Skip to main content

Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy

I have been obsessed with the BBC miniseries of the same name, ever since my good friend Mim told me about it. You can't go wrong with Sir Alec Guinness in the role of George Smiley. It's a spy story, from the novel by John le Carre. The author himself was a spy for British intelligence, apparently until the traitor Kim Philby blew his cover in the early '60s. I'm not going to spoil the story, and I'm not sure why I'm telling you this. Recently on the blog here, I've been sharing spiritual insights. Well, I guess I could say that there is nothing more unspiritual than a person trying to say something spiritually meaningful.

I suppose I tell you about this story, and potentially subsequent stories, because when I felt that my world was falling apart, Smiley and his friends--and his enemies--have brought me comfort. I definitely fought the urge to buy the books in the trilogy involving George Smiley. Suffice to say that when I get my next Audible credit, Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy is next on my list. They did a clever and great thing for that Audible edition: they're going to have Michael Jayston, who played Peter Guillam in the BBC miniseries, as the reader. Ostensibly this edition celebrates the recent 2011 film, but it's a great sign of respect to pay homage to the miniseries. Sir Alec Guinness is absolutely mesmerizing in the film, and in the film Smiley's People, produced a few years later.

I don't know why the stories bring me comfort; I don't know why I can repeatedly watch them without becoming bored. I suppose that the pandemic is also playing a role in our tendency to reach for the familiar.

On another hand still, I know a few people drawn to these stories who use them as an excuse to draw up elaborate conspiracies concerning current events. I suppose if someone is inclined to yell, "Don't trust the media!" they could find plenty of material to validate the idea that the most straightforward explanation is not necessarily the right one.

What also intrigues me about Smiley's People is that I had to watch it through about five times before I understood what was taking place. The author respects his audience enough not to participate in the dumbing-down of the material, even for a television audience. Some of the jargon is intuitive, and you get used to it, but some is most certainly not. I think one reason I appreciate these stories is that the Cold War represented an opportunity for broad Western consensus concerning political values; namely, an opposition to statist communism. The political consensus was never as total as romance would have us pretend, especially after the fact, but I am quite certain of my values, and I see them reflected here, broadly speaking.

This story draws connections in my mind with Tom Clancy's novel, The Hunt for Red October. Both stories reflect a broad Western opposition to Soviet communism, and I share that opposition, though I am no uncritical cheerleader for the capitalist alternative, nor for specific Western actions in pursuit of its goal of communism's destruction. Yet I suppose both stories make me feel patriotic in the best sense, and I have needed to belong.

In any case, I commend the so-called, "Smiley Trilogy" to you, even as I have not read it yet. It reminds us of a tense period in our history, the aftermath of which in its positive aspects, the younger generations cannot help but take for granted.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dear Alyse

 Today, you’re 35. Or at least you would be, in this place. You probably know this, but we’re OK. Not great, but OK. We know you wouldn’t want us moping around and weeping all the time. We try not to. Actually, I guess part of the problem is that you didn’t know how much we loved you. And that you didn’t know how to love yourself. I hope you have gotten to Love by now. Not a place, but fills everything in every way. I’m not Him, but he probably said, “Dear daughter/sister, you have been terribly hard on yourself. Rest now, and be at peace.” Anyway, teaching is going well, and I tell the kids all about you. They all say you are pretty. I usually can keep the boys from saying something gross for a few seconds. Mom and I are going to the game tonight. And like 6 more times, before I go back to South Carolina. I have seen Nicky twice, but I myself haven’t seen your younger kids. Bob took pictures of the day we said goodbye, and we did a family picture at the Abbey. I literally almost a...

We Don't Need No Magisterium: (Jason's Version) (But Actually, We Do)

Hilarious Com-Box Quote of The Day: "I was caught immediately because it is the Acts of the Apostles, not the Acts of the Holy Spirit Acting Erratically."--Donald Todd, reacting to the inartful opposition of the Holy Spirit and the Magisterium. Mark Galli, an editor at Christianity Today, had suggested that today's "confusion" in evangelicalism replicates a confusion on the day of Pentecost. Mr. Todd commented after this reply , and the original article is here. My thoughts: By what means was this Church-less "consensus" formed? If the Council did not possess the authority to adjudicate such questions, who does? If the Council Fathers did not intend to be the arbiters, why do they say that they do? At the risk of being rude, I would define evangelicalism as, "Whatever I want or need to believe at any particular time." Ecclesial authority to settle a particular question is a step forward, but only as long as, "God alone is Lord of the con...

My Thoughts On The Harrison Butker Commencement Speech

Update: I read the whole thing. I’m sorry, but what a weirdo. I thought you [Tom Darrow, of Denver, CO] made a trenchant case for why lockdowns are bad, and I definitely appreciated it. But a graduation speech is *not* the place for that. Secondly, this is an august event. It always is. I would never address the President of the United States in this manner. Never. Even the previous president, though he deserves it, if anyone does. Thirdly, the affirmations of Catholic identity should be more general. He has no authority to propound with specificity on all matters of great consequence. It has all the hallmarks of a culture war broadside, and again, a layman shouldn’t speak like this. The respect and reverence due the clergy is *always due,* even if they are weak, and outright wrong. We just don’t brush them aside like corrupt Mafia dons, to make a point. Fourthly, I don’t know where anyone gets the idea that the TLM is how God demands to be worshipped. The Church doesn’t teach that. ...