Skip to main content

The Crucifixion Of Jesus (John 19:17-30)

 They took Jesus out to the place of the skull, which suggests that many people died there. Perhaps it was a common place of execution. They made him carry his own Cross. Three men were executed, with Jesus in the middle. Pontius Pilate made a sign--in Hebrew, Latin, and Greek--which said, "Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews."

The Pharisees and other leaders objected, and they wanted Pilate to write that Jesus claimed to be the King of the Jews. He left the sign the same, probably as a little act of rebellion against the leaders with whom he was tired of arguing. It's a shame he didn't have enough courage to set Jesus free, but in doing what he did, he unintentionally told the deepest truth. Whether he was mocking or not, Jesus is the King, not only in Israel, but over the entire universe.

The soldiers who crucified Jesus took his clothes, but they didn't want to tear his tunic, so they cast lots for it, which is a bit like rolling dice.

The quotation there concerning that is from Psalm 22, a Psalm of David. The other Gospels record that Jesus said, "my God, my God, why have you abandoned me?" as he was crucified. Jesus's cry is the first line of Psalm 22. The section involving casting lots for the clothing of Jesus is verse 18 of Psalm 22. Jesus's cry in anguish does capture his sorrow, but what it also does is teach us that Jesus is fulfilling Psalm 22. Jesus does not want us to only think of the quoted portions of the Psalm, but to realize that the entire Psalm applies to what they are witnessing. Verse 24 of Psalm 22 says, "For he has not despised or scorned the suffering of the afflicted one; he has not hidden his face from him but has listened to his cry for help." (NIV) Because of this, we should be very careful to reject any ideas that Jesus was separated from the Father as he died upon the Cross.

What is interesting about the next part of the passage is that all of the men except for St. John ran away, while all of the women stayed near the Cross, to console Jesus. Jesus saw his mother standing there with St. John, and he tells them to look after each other. Many people has seen a deeper spiritual meaning in these statements, in all the centuries since we received St. John's Gospel, to the effect that Mary is not only the mother of Jesus, but the mother of all the disciples of Jesus. Also, it implies that St. John had a special devotion to her, and it would continue, throughout the lives of the apostles. Just as Eve was named Eve because she was the mother of all the living, the Church Fathers and others see Mary as the Mother of all those born again in Christ. Aside from this, I think it is important to recognize that mothers and fathers have a wonderful and important job, but our most important duty is to be spiritual mothers and fathers, and anyone can do that.

The death of Jesus Christ was a big moment in the history of the world. The wording in the Greek of "it is finished" implies that something has happened which is now past, but the effects resonate into the present day. A pastor once told me, "The blood of Christ is still fresh for you," which means that Jesus would still be willing to die for me, even knowing my sin. He does not need to die again, but he would, only for you, and only for me. St. John telling us that there was a specific moment when Jesus gave up his life reminds us that Jesus said, "No one takes my life from me; I lay it down of my own accord."

Great thinkers and saints have said that "I thirst" has a deeper spiritual meaning also. Jesus is thirsting for us, so that we will be with him in heaven, sharing the life of God. We have so much to meditate on, and to think about here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hilarious Com-Box Quote of The Day: "I was caught immediately because it is the Acts of the Apostles, not the Acts of the Holy Spirit Acting Erratically."--Donald Todd, reacting to the inartful opposition of the Holy Spirit and the Magisterium. Mark Galli, an editor at Christianity Today, had suggested that today's "confusion" in evangelicalism replicates a confusion on the day of Pentecost. Mr. Todd commented after this reply , and the original article is here. My thoughts: By what means was this Church-less "consensus" formed? If the Council did not possess the authority to adjudicate such questions, who does? If the Council Fathers did not intend to be the arbiters, why do they say that they do? At the risk of being rude, I would define evangelicalism as, "Whatever I want or need to believe at any particular time." Ecclesial authority to settle a particular question is a step forward, but only as long as, "God alone is Lord of the con

A Friend I Once Had, And The Dogmatic Principle

 I once had a friend, a dear friend, who helped me with personal care needs in college. Reformed Presbyterian to the core. When I was a Reformed Presbyterian, I visited their church many times. We were close. I still consider his siblings my friends. (And siblings in the Lord.) Nevertheless, when I began to consider the claims of the Catholic Church to be the Church Christ founded, he took me out to breakfast. He implied--but never quite stated--that we would not be brothers, if I sought full communion with the Catholic Church. That came true; a couple years later, I called him on his birthday, as I'd done every year for close to ten of them. He didn't recognize my number, and it was the most strained, awkward phone call I have ever had. We haven't spoken since. We were close enough that I attended the rehearsal dinner for his wedding. His wife's uncle is a Catholic priest. I remember reading a blog post of theirs, that early in their relationship, she told him of the p
My wheelchair was nearly destroyed by a car last night. That's a bit melodramatic, I suppose, because it is intact and undamaged. But we'd left my power chair ("Red Sam" in the official designation) in-between the maze of cars parked out front of Chris Yee's house for Bible Study. [Isn't that a Protestant Bible study?--ed.] They are good friends, and it is not under any official auspices. [Not BSF?--ed.] They're BSF guys, but it's not a BSF study. Anyway, I wasn't worried; I made a joke about calling the vendor the next day: "What seems to be the problem, sir?" 'Well, it was destroyed by a car.' As it happened, a guy bumped into it at slow speed. His car got the worst of it. And this only reinforces what I've said for a solid 13 years [Quickie commercial coming] If you want a power wheelchair that lasts, get a Quickie. They're fast, obviously, and they're tanks. Heck, my old one still would work, but the batteries ar