Skip to main content

The High Priestly Prayer, Part Two (John 17:6-19)

 Jesus says that he has made the Father's name known to his apostles, and he says that the Father gave the apostles to him. Jesus also says that the apostles believed what he shared with them, which is probably a generous interpretation of what the apostles said and did. Then again, when God writes our story, he is often more generous to us than we would be to ourselves.

Jesus says that everything he has is from the Father, which is what you would expect the obedient Son to say. Jesus also says that all the words he spoke were the words the Father gave him to say. Maybe what we could say is that the apostles had to believe fully in Jesus before Jesus could honestly pray this prayer. There may be many gifts that the Father intends to give us, but we are not yet ready to receive them.

Jesus is praying for his apostles, which is truly an amazing thing, and is a great mystery, because true prayer takes humility. And the mystery is that the glorious Son of God would humble himself at all. Not only that, but he humbles himself for these frail men, as well as us. Jesus says he is not praying for the world opposed to God, but for these chosen, who were called by the Father. Jesus then says basically that he and the Father share everything, including us.

What a great mystery, that Jesus would say that God is somehow glorified in the apostles and us! Jesus says the apostles will remain here in the ordinary sinful world that we know, while he goes to the Father. Jesus asks the Father to keep them in His name, which only Jesus knows. Jesus prays for this so that the apostles would be united in one purpose. The unity that the apostles will display is the same unity that exists between the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.

Jesus said that he protected the apostles while he was with them, and this is what the Good Shepherd would do. Not one of the apostles is lost, except for Judas Iscariot the betrayer. Judas represents the only known instance of an actual person confirmed in hell. This is not to say that he is the only one, but Jesus tells us directly that Judas is a "son of perdition," in fulfillment of the Scriptures.

Jesus is praying this prayer, he says, so that the joy of Jesus would be fulfilled in the apostles. This is a great mystery, and a wonderful blessing, because the joy of Jesus is powerful, and without limit.

Jesus gave the apostles the Father's word, and he says they are hated because they are not of the world, even as Jesus is not of the world. Jesus does not pray that the Father would take them out of this world, but that the Father would protect them from the evil one.

When Jesus prays that they would be "sanctified" in the truth, that means two things: first, to be sanctified is to be purified from sin. Second, to be sanctified is to be set apart for some holy purpose. The priests would do this for many of the sacred objects in the Temple, so Jesus is praying that they would be like sacred objects in his hands, and in the "hands" of the Father.

Jesus says that he is sending the apostles into the world, just as he was sent into the world by the Father. And here in verse 19, we recognize that Jesus does not need to be sanctified in that first sense of being made pure from sin, because he has no sin. In this way, the translators have chosen a word that means "set apart for some holy purpose," and that is the meaning of the word "consecrate." As Jesus is consecrated, he also consecrates the apostles in the truth given by the Father. This is a mind-blowing truth, and it frees us to trust God even more deeply.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My Thoughts On The Harrison Butker Commencement Speech

Update: I read the whole thing. I’m sorry, but what a weirdo. I thought you [Tom Darrow, of Denver, CO] made a trenchant case for why lockdowns are bad, and I definitely appreciated it. But a graduation speech is *not* the place for that. Secondly, this is an august event. It always is. I would never address the President of the United States in this manner. Never. Even the previous president, though he deserves it, if anyone does. Thirdly, the affirmations of Catholic identity should be more general. He has no authority to propound with specificity on all matters of great consequence. It has all the hallmarks of a culture war broadside, and again, a layman shouldn’t speak like this. The respect and reverence due the clergy is *always due,* even if they are weak, and outright wrong. We just don’t brush them aside like corrupt Mafia dons, to make a point. Fourthly, I don’t know where anyone gets the idea that the TLM is how God demands to be worshipped. The Church doesn’t teach that. ...

Dear Alyse

 Today, you’re 35. Or at least you would be, in this place. You probably know this, but we’re OK. Not great, but OK. We know you wouldn’t want us moping around and weeping all the time. We try not to. Actually, I guess part of the problem is that you didn’t know how much we loved you. And that you didn’t know how to love yourself. I hope you have gotten to Love by now. Not a place, but fills everything in every way. I’m not Him, but he probably said, “Dear daughter/sister, you have been terribly hard on yourself. Rest now, and be at peace.” Anyway, teaching is going well, and I tell the kids all about you. They all say you are pretty. I usually can keep the boys from saying something gross for a few seconds. Mom and I are going to the game tonight. And like 6 more times, before I go back to South Carolina. I have seen Nicky twice, but I myself haven’t seen your younger kids. Bob took pictures of the day we said goodbye, and we did a family picture at the Abbey. I literally almost a...

A Friend I Once Had, And The Dogmatic Principle

 I once had a friend, a dear friend, who helped me with personal care needs in college. Reformed Presbyterian to the core. When I was a Reformed Presbyterian, I visited their church many times. We were close. I still consider his siblings my friends. (And siblings in the Lord.) Nevertheless, when I began to consider the claims of the Catholic Church to be the Church Christ founded, he took me out to breakfast. He implied--but never quite stated--that we would not be brothers, if I sought full communion with the Catholic Church. That came true; a couple years later, I called him on his birthday, as I'd done every year for close to ten of them. He didn't recognize my number, and it was the most strained, awkward phone call I have ever had. We haven't spoken since. We were close enough that I attended the rehearsal dinner for his wedding. His wife's uncle is a Catholic priest. I remember reading a blog post of theirs, that early in their relationship, she told him of the p...