Skip to main content

9-11, 20 Years On

 I was in the bathroom of my residence hall in college, brushing my teeth. It was pretty late in the morning, actually. A guy ran in, telling me that 50,000 people probably just died in the World Trade Center, because some terrorists attacked it. I remember saying, "Come on man, don't joke about that. That's not funny." He wasn't joking.

I was sort of numb, but I went to the front desk, where I knew we would have news. On the whiteboard which had news every day, there was a little box off to the side, and it said, "In spite of what has happened, we are committed to not judging people based upon religion, or national origin." Today, it is fashionable to bash sentiments on diversity, or even to claim that a certain openness in that regard stifles discussion as to the nature of the truth. That may be true sometimes, but I have never been more proud to have been spoken for in that way. I did truly fix in my mind that the attackers were some sort of radical fringe, and I already knew from experience that real Muslims didn't do this. Even so, it was really hard to keep the anger and the tears at bay, and it was that way for weeks and months.

I had to go to class that day, and ironically at the time, I was taking a class called, "Politics and War." I made my way toward the class, and I saw my friend Liz Stover (Garber). We talked for a couple of minutes, whereupon I probably said something ridiculous, but we both agreed that we didn't know how to feel, or what to do.

When I got to class, there was a guy from somewhere in the Middle East, and he flat out said that America got what it deserved. There are a couple of days in my life where I have been angrier than I was that day, but I remember that it took all of my restraint and good sense and tolerance not to punch him, or at least scream in his face.

I remember a couple of moments from the aftermath in the days following. I remember when President Bush went to Ground Zero; I remember the speech he gave there, and that it was on a bullhorn. He said, "In the past few days, we've heard from our police, firefighters, and first responders. Those who did this will hear from all of us soon." The workers started chanting, "USA, USA, USA!" And it went on a really long time. That was the first moment that I felt a twinge of discomfort about where the response might go.

It is really true that patriotism surged after the attacks, and it wasn't a bad thing at all. I also remember that it did seem as though people were more neighborly than they had been, and they were looking out for each other. On the other side, there's a guy who owned a coffee shop in Columbia, Missouri, where I went to school. Some bad people vandalized his shop, because his name is Osama.

I still remember the speech from the president to the joint session of Congress on September 20. I can't even read the speech today without weeping. We could have a fantastic debate I am sure, about the actions that President Bush and Congress initiated after the fact. But in my mind and heart, President Bush came up huge in those days, and I will always be thankful for it.

In a certain way, the events of that day were a bit like the death of Princess Diana for the British, in the sense that we largely were mourning as a nation people that the vast majority of us did not know. Was it too much? Did it reveal some weakness in our character? I'll leave that for others to decide.

Maybe the biggest lesson that I learned is that true patriotism takes a lot of different forms, and that "coming together" does, too. And that war is never desirable, or good in itself. Aside from that, I've had to re-think a lot of what I probably thought was self-evident.

There is a certain goodness in being reflective today, and even in being sad, if we feel like that is appropriate. The media played the tapes of the video footage, and the intimate phone calls from the people to their loved ones on the hijacked airplanes, and it never fails to move me. At some point, though, I decided not to seek that stuff out, because I didn't want any negative feelings to become permanent habits of being.

You often hear about "remembering" 9-11, and I have to think about what it means to remember. I think very simply that I want to remember people who were friends and loved ones, and fellow Americans, and their lives were taken unjustly. They were snuffed out in moments, and others died, trying to save people, or at least recover their bodies. I want to be the sort of person who recoils from whatever habit of mind led those attackers to believe that killing innocent people was the right thing to do. That's my personal lesson: don't become like those who did this. Do your best to seek peace, and to be an agent of peace, in all areas of life. We can all at least try to do that, and to make a grace-filled effort to improve each day.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

We Don't Need No Magisterium: (Jason's Version) (But Actually, We Do)

Hilarious Com-Box Quote of The Day: "I was caught immediately because it is the Acts of the Apostles, not the Acts of the Holy Spirit Acting Erratically."--Donald Todd, reacting to the inartful opposition of the Holy Spirit and the Magisterium. Mark Galli, an editor at Christianity Today, had suggested that today's "confusion" in evangelicalism replicates a confusion on the day of Pentecost. Mr. Todd commented after this reply , and the original article is here. My thoughts: By what means was this Church-less "consensus" formed? If the Council did not possess the authority to adjudicate such questions, who does? If the Council Fathers did not intend to be the arbiters, why do they say that they do? At the risk of being rude, I would define evangelicalism as, "Whatever I want or need to believe at any particular time." Ecclesial authority to settle a particular question is a step forward, but only as long as, "God alone is Lord of the con...

Dear Alyse

 Today, you’re 35. Or at least you would be, in this place. You probably know this, but we’re OK. Not great, but OK. We know you wouldn’t want us moping around and weeping all the time. We try not to. Actually, I guess part of the problem is that you didn’t know how much we loved you. And that you didn’t know how to love yourself. I hope you have gotten to Love by now. Not a place, but fills everything in every way. I’m not Him, but he probably said, “Dear daughter/sister, you have been terribly hard on yourself. Rest now, and be at peace.” Anyway, teaching is going well, and I tell the kids all about you. They all say you are pretty. I usually can keep the boys from saying something gross for a few seconds. Mom and I are going to the game tonight. And like 6 more times, before I go back to South Carolina. I have seen Nicky twice, but I myself haven’t seen your younger kids. Bob took pictures of the day we said goodbye, and we did a family picture at the Abbey. I literally almost a...

Who Is Out Here Having Sex And Children With People They Don’t Like?

 And look, I’m not married. I’ve never been married. I have no children. I didn’t choose that; things just worked out that way. If you must know, I haven’t had sexual intercourse either. I probably should say “coitus,” so I am not arguing with some progressive activist about what “sexual intercourse” means. But I figured out from influencer videos or something what a “dead bedroom” was. Unless a couple mutually agrees that they don’t want to have sex/coitus anymore (hopefully to pray and serve) this is usually bad. I’ve known enough couples that it’s probably an indicator of trouble, especially for couples who are still able to have children. Is it really that wild to at least hope that Mr. and Mrs. Vance love each other? That a fourth child yet born at least might indicate that they enjoy each other?  Children are definitely not responsible for their parents’ happiness. That’s absolutely true. But wouldn’t any child hope their parents were happy, when they came into being? As...