Skip to main content

I’m Not Ambivalent About Today

 I’ve heard some left-of-center Christians say something like this, and I confess, I don’t understand it. I was never bruised by the “culture war,” and I am not ashamed of it, except perhaps to say that if total culture war is opposed to living in community, then and only then do I oppose it. Because the fact remains that I have been on the “wrong” or losing side the whole time. To oppose the fight itself would be to say that those who fought had illegitimate concerns. I can’t say that. Truthfully, something is only a “wedge issue” to those who disagree, and lack the courage of their own conviction. I believe this is true for other things as well, but abortion is front and center today.

If I have disagreements with the “Christian Right,” it’s over tactics, partisanship, and exaggerated apocalypticism.

Moreover, people could simply say, “I value other things more highly,” and move on. Yet it seems that bad faith and posturing is more valued than frank honesty.

The people know that popular culture leans Left socially, and perhaps economically, also. As much as I love Stephen Colbert—and the residual Catholicism of all three major US late-night hosts/comedians—all three have really bad ideas about ethics, and no amount of parish fish-fries and Catholic school makes them devout, strictly speaking.

You know that I’m more fond of President Biden than most of you, but he says foolish things about abortion and sexual ethics every single day. Pelosi shouldn’t—and hopefully won’t be the only Catholic to be denied Holy Communion, Biden included.

All that said, there is nothing explicitly religious or Christian about today’s decision. Plenty of atheists and agnostics also agree with what the Court has done. Natural law, and reason are more than sufficient to understand it. In that light, we can understand religious pro-abortion arguments and activism as sentimentality masking barbarism. “What is a person, and what do we owe them?” No amount of purported holy water and clerical nattering on or near the machinery of death alters the fundamental reality of what abortion is and does.

I personally have no desire or zeal for imposing my religion on anyone, for one thing. The true glory of Christianity is that of the whole self, given to God and others, freely and without compulsion.

I suppose I must be ready to gently convince and persuade, but I admit that when I hear an invocation to “listen” to those who are upset today, I am unmoved. We have listened to half-baked arguments, tortured analogies, and paranoia about abortion for decades. I don’t go a week without being accused of wanting to “control women” or their bodies, and that’s just nonsense. I don’t want women to be the victims of male predation, and lack of concern, for starters. The true victims of “sexual revolution” have always been women—not even counting the children—and only my awareness that many pro-choice men are simply ignorant fools keeps me from regarding them as intentionally evil.

Think of it: corporations will now pay one to cross state lines to abort a baby, because it’s cheaper than paid leave, and paid support for large, intact families. All these alleged haters of capitalism have been carrying water for The Man for decades, but Heaven forbid anyone carry a baby to term. It would be funny, if it weren’t so obviously sick.

I’m still very much open to a renewed discussion of public support for children and families—in light of my rigid pro-life stance—but if “Roe is on the ballot,” people are going to make it really tough for me to vote Democratic. I often accused them of being a one-issue party; please don’t prove me right. Republicans today disgust me almost as much as abortion does.

I probably could write about this for hours, but I’m going to stop, for now.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hilarious Com-Box Quote of The Day: "I was caught immediately because it is the Acts of the Apostles, not the Acts of the Holy Spirit Acting Erratically."--Donald Todd, reacting to the inartful opposition of the Holy Spirit and the Magisterium. Mark Galli, an editor at Christianity Today, had suggested that today's "confusion" in evangelicalism replicates a confusion on the day of Pentecost. Mr. Todd commented after this reply , and the original article is here. My thoughts: By what means was this Church-less "consensus" formed? If the Council did not possess the authority to adjudicate such questions, who does? If the Council Fathers did not intend to be the arbiters, why do they say that they do? At the risk of being rude, I would define evangelicalism as, "Whatever I want or need to believe at any particular time." Ecclesial authority to settle a particular question is a step forward, but only as long as, "God alone is Lord of the con

A Friend I Once Had, And The Dogmatic Principle

 I once had a friend, a dear friend, who helped me with personal care needs in college. Reformed Presbyterian to the core. When I was a Reformed Presbyterian, I visited their church many times. We were close. I still consider his siblings my friends. (And siblings in the Lord.) Nevertheless, when I began to consider the claims of the Catholic Church to be the Church Christ founded, he took me out to breakfast. He implied--but never quite stated--that we would not be brothers, if I sought full communion with the Catholic Church. That came true; a couple years later, I called him on his birthday, as I'd done every year for close to ten of them. He didn't recognize my number, and it was the most strained, awkward phone call I have ever had. We haven't spoken since. We were close enough that I attended the rehearsal dinner for his wedding. His wife's uncle is a Catholic priest. I remember reading a blog post of theirs, that early in their relationship, she told him of the p
My wheelchair was nearly destroyed by a car last night. That's a bit melodramatic, I suppose, because it is intact and undamaged. But we'd left my power chair ("Red Sam" in the official designation) in-between the maze of cars parked out front of Chris Yee's house for Bible Study. [Isn't that a Protestant Bible study?--ed.] They are good friends, and it is not under any official auspices. [Not BSF?--ed.] They're BSF guys, but it's not a BSF study. Anyway, I wasn't worried; I made a joke about calling the vendor the next day: "What seems to be the problem, sir?" 'Well, it was destroyed by a car.' As it happened, a guy bumped into it at slow speed. His car got the worst of it. And this only reinforces what I've said for a solid 13 years [Quickie commercial coming] If you want a power wheelchair that lasts, get a Quickie. They're fast, obviously, and they're tanks. Heck, my old one still would work, but the batteries ar