Skip to main content

I’m Not Ambivalent About Today

 I’ve heard some left-of-center Christians say something like this, and I confess, I don’t understand it. I was never bruised by the “culture war,” and I am not ashamed of it, except perhaps to say that if total culture war is opposed to living in community, then and only then do I oppose it. Because the fact remains that I have been on the “wrong” or losing side the whole time. To oppose the fight itself would be to say that those who fought had illegitimate concerns. I can’t say that. Truthfully, something is only a “wedge issue” to those who disagree, and lack the courage of their own conviction. I believe this is true for other things as well, but abortion is front and center today.

If I have disagreements with the “Christian Right,” it’s over tactics, partisanship, and exaggerated apocalypticism.

Moreover, people could simply say, “I value other things more highly,” and move on. Yet it seems that bad faith and posturing is more valued than frank honesty.

The people know that popular culture leans Left socially, and perhaps economically, also. As much as I love Stephen Colbert—and the residual Catholicism of all three major US late-night hosts/comedians—all three have really bad ideas about ethics, and no amount of parish fish-fries and Catholic school makes them devout, strictly speaking.

You know that I’m more fond of President Biden than most of you, but he says foolish things about abortion and sexual ethics every single day. Pelosi shouldn’t—and hopefully won’t be the only Catholic to be denied Holy Communion, Biden included.

All that said, there is nothing explicitly religious or Christian about today’s decision. Plenty of atheists and agnostics also agree with what the Court has done. Natural law, and reason are more than sufficient to understand it. In that light, we can understand religious pro-abortion arguments and activism as sentimentality masking barbarism. “What is a person, and what do we owe them?” No amount of purported holy water and clerical nattering on or near the machinery of death alters the fundamental reality of what abortion is and does.

I personally have no desire or zeal for imposing my religion on anyone, for one thing. The true glory of Christianity is that of the whole self, given to God and others, freely and without compulsion.

I suppose I must be ready to gently convince and persuade, but I admit that when I hear an invocation to “listen” to those who are upset today, I am unmoved. We have listened to half-baked arguments, tortured analogies, and paranoia about abortion for decades. I don’t go a week without being accused of wanting to “control women” or their bodies, and that’s just nonsense. I don’t want women to be the victims of male predation, and lack of concern, for starters. The true victims of “sexual revolution” have always been women—not even counting the children—and only my awareness that many pro-choice men are simply ignorant fools keeps me from regarding them as intentionally evil.

Think of it: corporations will now pay one to cross state lines to abort a baby, because it’s cheaper than paid leave, and paid support for large, intact families. All these alleged haters of capitalism have been carrying water for The Man for decades, but Heaven forbid anyone carry a baby to term. It would be funny, if it weren’t so obviously sick.

I’m still very much open to a renewed discussion of public support for children and families—in light of my rigid pro-life stance—but if “Roe is on the ballot,” people are going to make it really tough for me to vote Democratic. I often accused them of being a one-issue party; please don’t prove me right. Republicans today disgust me almost as much as abortion does.

I probably could write about this for hours, but I’m going to stop, for now.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My Thoughts On The Harrison Butker Commencement Speech

Update: I read the whole thing. I’m sorry, but what a weirdo. I thought you [Tom Darrow, of Denver, CO] made a trenchant case for why lockdowns are bad, and I definitely appreciated it. But a graduation speech is *not* the place for that. Secondly, this is an august event. It always is. I would never address the President of the United States in this manner. Never. Even the previous president, though he deserves it, if anyone does. Thirdly, the affirmations of Catholic identity should be more general. He has no authority to propound with specificity on all matters of great consequence. It has all the hallmarks of a culture war broadside, and again, a layman shouldn’t speak like this. The respect and reverence due the clergy is *always due,* even if they are weak, and outright wrong. We just don’t brush them aside like corrupt Mafia dons, to make a point. Fourthly, I don’t know where anyone gets the idea that the TLM is how God demands to be worshipped. The Church doesn’t teach that. ...

Dear Alyse

 Today, you’re 35. Or at least you would be, in this place. You probably know this, but we’re OK. Not great, but OK. We know you wouldn’t want us moping around and weeping all the time. We try not to. Actually, I guess part of the problem is that you didn’t know how much we loved you. And that you didn’t know how to love yourself. I hope you have gotten to Love by now. Not a place, but fills everything in every way. I’m not Him, but he probably said, “Dear daughter/sister, you have been terribly hard on yourself. Rest now, and be at peace.” Anyway, teaching is going well, and I tell the kids all about you. They all say you are pretty. I usually can keep the boys from saying something gross for a few seconds. Mom and I are going to the game tonight. And like 6 more times, before I go back to South Carolina. I have seen Nicky twice, but I myself haven’t seen your younger kids. Bob took pictures of the day we said goodbye, and we did a family picture at the Abbey. I literally almost a...

A Friend I Once Had, And The Dogmatic Principle

 I once had a friend, a dear friend, who helped me with personal care needs in college. Reformed Presbyterian to the core. When I was a Reformed Presbyterian, I visited their church many times. We were close. I still consider his siblings my friends. (And siblings in the Lord.) Nevertheless, when I began to consider the claims of the Catholic Church to be the Church Christ founded, he took me out to breakfast. He implied--but never quite stated--that we would not be brothers, if I sought full communion with the Catholic Church. That came true; a couple years later, I called him on his birthday, as I'd done every year for close to ten of them. He didn't recognize my number, and it was the most strained, awkward phone call I have ever had. We haven't spoken since. We were close enough that I attended the rehearsal dinner for his wedding. His wife's uncle is a Catholic priest. I remember reading a blog post of theirs, that early in their relationship, she told him of the p...