Skip to main content
Well, it sure looks like the regular folks in the GOP are lining up behind Rick Santorum. We know that I'm totally sold out on Santorum. I love him. No, seriously. You may be saying to yourself, "What would make an anti-authoritarian libertarian ideologue who couldn't even stomach McCain vote for Mr. Big Government Santorum?" I'm glad you asked. This is the best I can do, so here goes: There are two kinds of "establishment" candidates; the first kind rankles any normal person who can lay legitimate claim to having a conservative thought. He's the kind of candidate whose version of balance and electability is to capitulate to Democratic/socialist/progressive ideology only in part and in completely random fashion, such that one's own supporters want to strangle one. (McCain fits here, but in his defense, 2000 McCain was 1000 times worse than the 2008 version.) Think Nixon or Ford. People that provoke rightist third parties, and cause barely literate narcissist peanut farmers to be elected president. If you want to know which person this is, ask the voters of the Democratic party who they prefer. You don't want to be that guy. Even if you win the nomination, your supporters sit at parties saying, "Who are the stupid %^&%&! who voted for this guy?" and "This is why primaries should never be open." This year, that man is Romney. Ironically, last time, he got to be The Last-Ditch Hope against McCain. I never got that, but OK. With apologies to Tim, he may never understand how disliked McCain really is. He may even be genuine in his affection. But he's the epitome of why I am unashamed to be an ideologue. (See also Lugar, Richard; Hagel, Chuck; and Chaffee, Lincoln for some non-presidential examples.)
But there is one other type of establishment candidate who satisfies the needs of winning and governing pragmatically without alienating core supporters. You know he's not ideal or that you don't line up with him, but at the end of the day, he's one of ours. Such a man is very skilled, because he can explain himself without making you feel crazy or stupid if you disagree. This is Santorum. You tell me: Is it easier to move Santorum more conservative if the need arises, or is he at heart one who craves liberal acceptance? That's what I thought. The New Republic likes Romney. They think he'll win, too. That's all I need to know. I'll take Santorum's breaks from economic conservatism any day. In the end, he's not a statist, even if he plays the populist. And the next president gets 2 Supreme Court picks, minimum. You tell me: Would he lose re-election for the sake of defenseless babies? That's what I thought. Scalia may retire, but Breyer and Ginsburg definitely will. Justice Kennedy isn't long for this deal, either. It's 4-5 on abortion right now. Don't even try to tell me you wouldn't take a shot if it was your call. Romney's not at all certain to appoint pro-life judges. Gingrich can't win. Any questions?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My Thoughts On The Harrison Butker Commencement Speech

Update: I read the whole thing. I’m sorry, but what a weirdo. I thought you [Tom Darrow, of Denver, CO] made a trenchant case for why lockdowns are bad, and I definitely appreciated it. But a graduation speech is *not* the place for that. Secondly, this is an august event. It always is. I would never address the President of the United States in this manner. Never. Even the previous president, though he deserves it, if anyone does. Thirdly, the affirmations of Catholic identity should be more general. He has no authority to propound with specificity on all matters of great consequence. It has all the hallmarks of a culture war broadside, and again, a layman shouldn’t speak like this. The respect and reverence due the clergy is *always due,* even if they are weak, and outright wrong. We just don’t brush them aside like corrupt Mafia dons, to make a point. Fourthly, I don’t know where anyone gets the idea that the TLM is how God demands to be worshipped. The Church doesn’t teach that. ...

Dear Alyse

 Today, you’re 35. Or at least you would be, in this place. You probably know this, but we’re OK. Not great, but OK. We know you wouldn’t want us moping around and weeping all the time. We try not to. Actually, I guess part of the problem is that you didn’t know how much we loved you. And that you didn’t know how to love yourself. I hope you have gotten to Love by now. Not a place, but fills everything in every way. I’m not Him, but he probably said, “Dear daughter/sister, you have been terribly hard on yourself. Rest now, and be at peace.” Anyway, teaching is going well, and I tell the kids all about you. They all say you are pretty. I usually can keep the boys from saying something gross for a few seconds. Mom and I are going to the game tonight. And like 6 more times, before I go back to South Carolina. I have seen Nicky twice, but I myself haven’t seen your younger kids. Bob took pictures of the day we said goodbye, and we did a family picture at the Abbey. I literally almost a...

A Friend I Once Had, And The Dogmatic Principle

 I once had a friend, a dear friend, who helped me with personal care needs in college. Reformed Presbyterian to the core. When I was a Reformed Presbyterian, I visited their church many times. We were close. I still consider his siblings my friends. (And siblings in the Lord.) Nevertheless, when I began to consider the claims of the Catholic Church to be the Church Christ founded, he took me out to breakfast. He implied--but never quite stated--that we would not be brothers, if I sought full communion with the Catholic Church. That came true; a couple years later, I called him on his birthday, as I'd done every year for close to ten of them. He didn't recognize my number, and it was the most strained, awkward phone call I have ever had. We haven't spoken since. We were close enough that I attended the rehearsal dinner for his wedding. His wife's uncle is a Catholic priest. I remember reading a blog post of theirs, that early in their relationship, she told him of the p...