Skip to main content

5 More Piquant Thoughts

5. It's not hard. Freedom means being able to do what you will within the commands of the gospel. If my weaker brother asks me not to eat or drink for his sake, his needs are greater than my freedom. I've done this a million times. If you struggle with a sin in some area, you are not as free as the man who doesn't. You are bound by the chains of the gospel, even if another finds your self-imposed restrictions limiting for him. He cannot tell you to adopt his standard if this would harm you, and you can't judge him for his, either. We've got to back each other up in our mutual pursuit of holiness. This is charity, and this is what St. Paul was getting at. I think some of you in regard to drinking give cautions to other Christians in order to protect weaker brothers, but the truth is, you actually are that weaker brother. If you believe a brother or sister has sinned, tell him or her. There is no need for general "cautions." The strong Christian worries about himself, primarily, and not what others might do. (And I do not like to make subjective anecdotal statements relating to the alleged superiority of Catholicism, but if I did, food and drink would be at the top of that list. We're just healthier about these things; we don't bother people about those judgment call kind of things.

4. The Catechism is for all of us, of course, but did you know it was envisioned as kind of like Cliff's Notes for the bishops? Maybe some American bishops are not as good as they could be simply because they have not read it consistently, or they think they're too good for the basics. Pope Francis is who he is because he's never thought he was too good to go back to the beginning. Maybe the life of continual conversion is really just getting better and better at the basics. Whoa. Stew on that for awhile.

3. Yes, in fact, I unreservedly love Pope Francis. Let the books be written long after he has left us. We can see he loves Christ and the Church; let us remember that we have endured far worse, despite whatever quibbles we might have. I'll take "Borgia Popes" for $1000, Alex.

2. You might want to properly define semi-Pelagianism before you go tossing it around. I have no trouble at least imagining that the Catholic view of salvation ascribes too much to human ability; it is not the fact of co-operation that makes Pelagianism and semi-Pelagianism false; it is rather the basic contention that man is able to make the first move on the supernatural level without grace. There is a 92.4% chance you've gotten this wrong if you are a Calvinist. I did it, too. Everyone together: "The Catholic Church believes salvation is ever and always by God's grace." You don't have to like the system, but there ain't Pelagius anywhere in it. Trust me, I looked.

1. No, seriously. Someone stole our antiphons, and it's no longer amusing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

We Don't Need No Magisterium: (Jason's Version) (But Actually, We Do)

Hilarious Com-Box Quote of The Day: "I was caught immediately because it is the Acts of the Apostles, not the Acts of the Holy Spirit Acting Erratically."--Donald Todd, reacting to the inartful opposition of the Holy Spirit and the Magisterium. Mark Galli, an editor at Christianity Today, had suggested that today's "confusion" in evangelicalism replicates a confusion on the day of Pentecost. Mr. Todd commented after this reply , and the original article is here. My thoughts: By what means was this Church-less "consensus" formed? If the Council did not possess the authority to adjudicate such questions, who does? If the Council Fathers did not intend to be the arbiters, why do they say that they do? At the risk of being rude, I would define evangelicalism as, "Whatever I want or need to believe at any particular time." Ecclesial authority to settle a particular question is a step forward, but only as long as, "God alone is Lord of the con...

Dear Alyse

 Today, you’re 35. Or at least you would be, in this place. You probably know this, but we’re OK. Not great, but OK. We know you wouldn’t want us moping around and weeping all the time. We try not to. Actually, I guess part of the problem is that you didn’t know how much we loved you. And that you didn’t know how to love yourself. I hope you have gotten to Love by now. Not a place, but fills everything in every way. I’m not Him, but he probably said, “Dear daughter/sister, you have been terribly hard on yourself. Rest now, and be at peace.” Anyway, teaching is going well, and I tell the kids all about you. They all say you are pretty. I usually can keep the boys from saying something gross for a few seconds. Mom and I are going to the game tonight. And like 6 more times, before I go back to South Carolina. I have seen Nicky twice, but I myself haven’t seen your younger kids. Bob took pictures of the day we said goodbye, and we did a family picture at the Abbey. I literally almost a...

Who Is Out Here Having Sex And Children With People They Don’t Like?

 And look, I’m not married. I’ve never been married. I have no children. I didn’t choose that; things just worked out that way. If you must know, I haven’t had sexual intercourse either. I probably should say “coitus,” so I am not arguing with some progressive activist about what “sexual intercourse” means. But I figured out from influencer videos or something what a “dead bedroom” was. Unless a couple mutually agrees that they don’t want to have sex/coitus anymore (hopefully to pray and serve) this is usually bad. I’ve known enough couples that it’s probably an indicator of trouble, especially for couples who are still able to have children. Is it really that wild to at least hope that Mr. and Mrs. Vance love each other? That a fourth child yet born at least might indicate that they enjoy each other?  Children are definitely not responsible for their parents’ happiness. That’s absolutely true. But wouldn’t any child hope their parents were happy, when they came into being? As...