Ben Carmack has asked to go through the 95 Theses, so even though that's a Lutheran document, and he's not Lutheran, I'll try to keep the snarky chuckles and jokes about the allegedly perspicuous Scriptures to a minimum. Let's just do 5 for now, eh?
When our Lord and Master, Jesus Christ, said
"Repent", He called for the entire life of believers to be one of
repentance. My comment: This appears to completely unobjectionable. We agree
that lives are to be entire, marked by a continuing awareness of our need for
God's mercy.
The word cannot be properly understood as referring to the
sacrament of penance, i.e. confession and satisfaction, as administered by the
clergy. My comment: This is objectionable. The greatness of the New Covenant is
in the power of the sacraments to confer grace ex opere operato, that
is, by the fact of it being performed. What a joy, if I go to Confession,
whether with small burdens or large ones, that Christ, as the true minister of
all sacraments, pardons the penitent who seeks him in good conscience! St. Thomas
said previously in essence that this sacramental economy distinguishes the New
Covenant from the Old. (Ironic, that the Protestant position turns the clock
back on redemptive history.)
Yet its meaning is not restricted to repentance in one's
heart; for such repentance is null unless it produces outward signs in various
mortifications of the flesh. My comment: This could be Catholic, but given his
known position that the will is in bondage, it cannot be understood in the
Catholic way, that a man participates in his own redemption by not only
assenting to the truths of faith, but bearing fruit in holiness of life and
works, testifying that his faith is formed by agape.
As long as hatred of self abides (i.e. true inward
repentance) the penalty of sin abides, viz., until we enter the kingdom of
heaven. My comment: It depends on what he means by "hatred of self."
If he means hatred of sin, fine. If he means total depravity, the Church has
never said that the man by nature is incapable of good, as Luther may be
implying.
The pope has neither the will nor the power to remit any
penalties beyond those imposed either at his own discretion or by canon law. My
comment: I don't understand why this is here. Yes, the pope's jurisdiction is
limited by collegiality, and the legitimate recognition of the jurisdiction of
others. But "his own discretion" is pretty broad, since he is the
head of all the successors to the Apostles, and Luther knows it. In short, the
Pope can remit any penalty, since he holds the keys.
Come back for more (heretical) fun with Luther!
Come back for more (heretical) fun with Luther!
Comments