Skip to main content

Abortion Politics, Reconsidered (Feminism Still Sucks)

I would not say that I know anything about the matter under discussion, primarily because I am not a woman. At this point, for legions of people, that's the end of the discussion. We should call out that intellectual laziness whenever it appears. Nobody gets a pass on considering the moral question, regardless of their sex. Side note: I said "sex" because "gender" is a fabricated word, created to confuse people.

I wouldn't say I know for sure that every politician who says crazy things while advocating for abortion is seared in their conscience, and possibly suffering post-abortive emotional wounds. That's true in many cases, but surely not in all.

I think it's more about belonging. There are now several generations of people who will not, and cannot, re-consider the morality of abortion because a "woman's right to choose" means, "The right to not be told what to do." It means feminism; it means freedom.

We might say that feminism has sold them a bill of goods in the first place, and that is true. But as long as feminism is associated with female empowerment, we won't win the fight against abortion.

I saw an article the other day, and it said something like, "Every time I see a man say he doesn't need feminism, I want to vomit." Well, sorry, ma'am, but I don't need feminism, and neither do you.

We all need to be affirmed and appreciated in our gifts and in using them; we all need to be loved as the people we are, even if that person needs to change. I'm willing to say that there might even be a cultural imbalance in how the sexes are appreciated that favors men. What I won't say is that we need feminism.

Feminism is a movement to acquire political and social power for women at the expense of all men. The last few words are the key. Just because you want to elevate women in certain situations does not mean you are a feminist. Just because you deplore sexual violence doesn't make you a feminist; perhaps, like me, you deplore various mixed messages sent to women and girls; you're still not a feminist. If, however, the way forward is the subjugation of men, and the vicious power structure that encourages them, you might be a feminist. They may count several "enlightened" men as allies, but they resent them. Sorry, fellas: If you are telling a woman you agree with her feminist politics for sex, it's not going to happen. A true feminist won't even reconsider the matter when she is what we used to call a "spinster." She would rather be unhappy than to stop blaming men for all the problems in the world. Paging Maureen Dowd!

My rant for the day.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hilarious Com-Box Quote of The Day: "I was caught immediately because it is the Acts of the Apostles, not the Acts of the Holy Spirit Acting Erratically."--Donald Todd, reacting to the inartful opposition of the Holy Spirit and the Magisterium. Mark Galli, an editor at Christianity Today, had suggested that today's "confusion" in evangelicalism replicates a confusion on the day of Pentecost. Mr. Todd commented after this reply , and the original article is here. My thoughts: By what means was this Church-less "consensus" formed? If the Council did not possess the authority to adjudicate such questions, who does? If the Council Fathers did not intend to be the arbiters, why do they say that they do? At the risk of being rude, I would define evangelicalism as, "Whatever I want or need to believe at any particular time." Ecclesial authority to settle a particular question is a step forward, but only as long as, "God alone is Lord of the con

A Friend I Once Had, And The Dogmatic Principle

 I once had a friend, a dear friend, who helped me with personal care needs in college. Reformed Presbyterian to the core. When I was a Reformed Presbyterian, I visited their church many times. We were close. I still consider his siblings my friends. (And siblings in the Lord.) Nevertheless, when I began to consider the claims of the Catholic Church to be the Church Christ founded, he took me out to breakfast. He implied--but never quite stated--that we would not be brothers, if I sought full communion with the Catholic Church. That came true; a couple years later, I called him on his birthday, as I'd done every year for close to ten of them. He didn't recognize my number, and it was the most strained, awkward phone call I have ever had. We haven't spoken since. We were close enough that I attended the rehearsal dinner for his wedding. His wife's uncle is a Catholic priest. I remember reading a blog post of theirs, that early in their relationship, she told him of the p
My wheelchair was nearly destroyed by a car last night. That's a bit melodramatic, I suppose, because it is intact and undamaged. But we'd left my power chair ("Red Sam" in the official designation) in-between the maze of cars parked out front of Chris Yee's house for Bible Study. [Isn't that a Protestant Bible study?--ed.] They are good friends, and it is not under any official auspices. [Not BSF?--ed.] They're BSF guys, but it's not a BSF study. Anyway, I wasn't worried; I made a joke about calling the vendor the next day: "What seems to be the problem, sir?" 'Well, it was destroyed by a car.' As it happened, a guy bumped into it at slow speed. His car got the worst of it. And this only reinforces what I've said for a solid 13 years [Quickie commercial coming] If you want a power wheelchair that lasts, get a Quickie. They're fast, obviously, and they're tanks. Heck, my old one still would work, but the batteries ar