Skip to main content

Back To the Beginning

I can remember the beginning. The early days with Jesus, and even before that, when I was simply curious about God, without knowing anything about Him. There is an idea, or set of ideas, that gets a bum rap in Christian circles these days; it's called, "moral therapeutic deism". The basic idea is that God exists, but he exists to make us feel better about ourselves. Religion itself exists in this conception as the atheist says it does: to provide us comfort and sustenance through the hardship of this life. You can see how bunch of Christian leaders could get all bent out of shape about this, when they realize that their sheep know nothing about doctrine, or endurance, or obedience. On the other hand, I may be the only person who has been helped by the prevailing culture of moral therapeutic deism. I knew that God existed, and I knew that he had to be good. I knew that the multiple tragedies of my young life made God sad, if there is such a thing. [There is. Jesus wept.--ed.] In short, I knew that God loved me, and that there was an answer to the suffering I experienced. I didn't understand that I needed him, and that I myself needed forgiveness. I didn't understand that Jesus was Lord and Savior.

 A Rabbi Kushner wrote a book called, "Why Bad Things Happen to Good People". I read that, and I was ripe for the picking, in terms of conversion. It's because the good Rabbi deals with the problem of pain and Providence by sacrificing the notion that God is all-powerful. I definitely understand the appeal of wanting to do this, because the pain of this world is not theoretical. In fact, if the terrors and degradations against Jewish people don't cause you to have moments of doubt about the plan of Providence, I can't help you. Sometimes we demand an answer, and we're not going to get one, at least not in this life. I don't know how or why this recognition kept me from agnosticism, or even atheism, but I would have said that somehow Goodness was protecting me. My best answer to the sorrow of the world is still, "I don't understand," and I don't need to investigate it further. In my experience, getting through the suffering is more important than demanding an explanation.

If we know that we are loved, even in simply human terms, we can endure almost anything. On the supernatural level, this is still true. However, this is why particular kinds of abuse and trauma are so damaging: because they cause people to misunderstand love, or even to doubt that they have received it from still others. I could have been irretrievably broken many times, or so it seems. Nevertheless, it also seems as though Love Himself has been chasing me, as long as I have been able to understand anything. I suppose therefore that I am in the right business, so to speak.

I suppose the gift of knowing more about God is to take the opportunity to allow Him to love me, to stop running away, hopefully to stop trying to find my completion in other things.

I think the best thing about religion properly understood, is that it is not some weirdly inhuman thing that is superimposed upon my life, and its relationships. Rather, God revealing himself is the explanation for all that you and I seek, the personal articulation of everything we hope for. I have felt God chasing me, precisely because he is chasing all of us. We know that it is not meaningless, this life, because so many of us refuse to surrender--at least completely--to our more selfish instincts, or to the bitterness that could so easily consume us in the face of all this suffering. Some people claim that I simply make a meaning out of essentially nothing. A person who truly believed this would encourage me to kill his mother. We know better, and we even ought to know that any "society" which encouraged people to kill their mothers would be a defective society. On the other hand, we accept and tolerate so many things that ought to be similarly outrageous, probably by endless repetition and acceptance.

I digress.

In the end, I don't know too much more than I knew at the beginning. What I know I know more deeply, more personally, more intimately. It is a journey of self-discovery, but it is also in a unique way the true reality of the world outside.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dear Alyse

 Today, you’re 35. Or at least you would be, in this place. You probably know this, but we’re OK. Not great, but OK. We know you wouldn’t want us moping around and weeping all the time. We try not to. Actually, I guess part of the problem is that you didn’t know how much we loved you. And that you didn’t know how to love yourself. I hope you have gotten to Love by now. Not a place, but fills everything in every way. I’m not Him, but he probably said, “Dear daughter/sister, you have been terribly hard on yourself. Rest now, and be at peace.” Anyway, teaching is going well, and I tell the kids all about you. They all say you are pretty. I usually can keep the boys from saying something gross for a few seconds. Mom and I are going to the game tonight. And like 6 more times, before I go back to South Carolina. I have seen Nicky twice, but I myself haven’t seen your younger kids. Bob took pictures of the day we said goodbye, and we did a family picture at the Abbey. I literally almost a...
Hilarious Com-Box Quote of The Day: "I was caught immediately because it is the Acts of the Apostles, not the Acts of the Holy Spirit Acting Erratically."--Donald Todd, reacting to the inartful opposition of the Holy Spirit and the Magisterium. Mark Galli, an editor at Christianity Today, had suggested that today's "confusion" in evangelicalism replicates a confusion on the day of Pentecost. Mr. Todd commented after this reply , and the original article is here. My thoughts: By what means was this Church-less "consensus" formed? If the Council did not possess the authority to adjudicate such questions, who does? If the Council Fathers did not intend to be the arbiters, why do they say that they do? At the risk of being rude, I would define evangelicalism as, "Whatever I want or need to believe at any particular time." Ecclesial authority to settle a particular question is a step forward, but only as long as, "God alone is Lord of the con...

A Friend I Once Had, And The Dogmatic Principle

 I once had a friend, a dear friend, who helped me with personal care needs in college. Reformed Presbyterian to the core. When I was a Reformed Presbyterian, I visited their church many times. We were close. I still consider his siblings my friends. (And siblings in the Lord.) Nevertheless, when I began to consider the claims of the Catholic Church to be the Church Christ founded, he took me out to breakfast. He implied--but never quite stated--that we would not be brothers, if I sought full communion with the Catholic Church. That came true; a couple years later, I called him on his birthday, as I'd done every year for close to ten of them. He didn't recognize my number, and it was the most strained, awkward phone call I have ever had. We haven't spoken since. We were close enough that I attended the rehearsal dinner for his wedding. His wife's uncle is a Catholic priest. I remember reading a blog post of theirs, that early in their relationship, she told him of the p...