The last 10 years or so has been a grand demonstration of the Dunning-Kruger effect, especially as the internet and associated technologies have democratized information. I'm not a fan of the consequent populism, either here in the US, or worldwide. I went to college. I believe in vaccines. I would have hoped Q-Anon was a 12-step program for people obsessed with the actor John de Lancie. [Aren't you in that?--ed.] Hey, we're not talking about me right now, OK?
But the problem with public health for quite a while is that even though you'll never lose money betting on the stupidity of a large group of people, actual persons hate when you talk down to them. These experts do it all the time. And they think they have to lie to ordinary people in order to get them to make the right choice. Seriously, don't do that.
The WHO is this arrogance on steroids. I can't think of one time I have thought, "My life would be so much worse, without the World Health Organization." One could be forgiven for thinking that the WHO was created so that legions of do-gooders could cite them in high school study projects.
The type of people who are upset about the US withdrawing (in some sense) from the WHO are the same type of people who buy those, "Your Google Search Doesn't Replace My PhD" mugs. That's funny for half a second, and then most people go, "Wow, what an asshole."
Comments