Skip to main content

Follow-Up: Jesus In The New Testament

 In my last post, I took a shot at Ricky Gervais. Well, not really. More like a shot at atheist-flavored ignorance, which even as an entertainer, he’s pretty visible for.

We need to actually speak plainly about what we have recorded in what Christians call the New Testament, or New Covenant. Church people, step out of the shoes of loving Jesus and His Church for one moment. How does the New Testament read or sound on the face of it? Let’s just focus on the four Gospels. That’s where all the stuff allegedly said by Jesus is recorded. Jesus as a liar doesn’t have much evidence behind it; he didn’t lounge in Malta after all the stuff, getting rich after selling purported baptismal water. He got called a blasphemer by his own people, and executed as a disturber of the peace by the Roman Empire. Let’s set aside Jesus’ alleged resurrection and every miracle he did for a moment as well.

Jesus being crazy seems to have some evidence behind it.

No sensible philosopher I have ever heard would talk like that. If Jesus sounds like a good teacher to you, you haven’t read the Gospels at all. Even taking into account the rabbinical penchant for purposeful overstatement, Jesus is pretty out there. Lewis was right: the “good teacher” cope is patronizing born of ignorance of the source material.

To be totally fair, Genesis to Malachi doesn’t read or sound like a home improvement book from Bob Villa. Not sure if you have noticed that. The comedians sure have, and they are not wrong.

Even if we only granted the possibility of miracles and prophecy to the first half of the book [God of Israel: The Motion Picture—.ed] Jesus’ opponents make strong points. I’m not kidding. You’d have to sympathize with the Pharisees recorded in St. John, who basically said, “C’mon, man. We watched you grow up, we know your family, and you came down from Heaven? OK.” In a way, if you don’t see “the bad guys” as the reasonable people, you won’t understand the magnitude of faith, of what God is expecting and inviting you into.

This, by the way, is why religion on ordinary TV seems so stupid: real believers don’t go to God to figure out how to be good people; they go to God because they know they aren’t, and the time for figuring that out and fixing it is very short. The plainer, blunter message is this: God forgives and invites into relationship, because He is going to fix and judge anything broken and evil. When he does, there’s nothing after that, but blissful relationship with God or Hell.

Figure out if it’s possible that the supernatural world could or does exist. Then figure out if that matters to you. But I have known good people at secular nonprofits. You don’t need religion or God, if all you’re trying to do is live and die with a bit of comfort in between.

But what if Jesus is Lord?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dear Alyse

 Today, you’re 35. Or at least you would be, in this place. You probably know this, but we’re OK. Not great, but OK. We know you wouldn’t want us moping around and weeping all the time. We try not to. Actually, I guess part of the problem is that you didn’t know how much we loved you. And that you didn’t know how to love yourself. I hope you have gotten to Love by now. Not a place, but fills everything in every way. I’m not Him, but he probably said, “Dear daughter/sister, you have been terribly hard on yourself. Rest now, and be at peace.” Anyway, teaching is going well, and I tell the kids all about you. They all say you are pretty. I usually can keep the boys from saying something gross for a few seconds. Mom and I are going to the game tonight. And like 6 more times, before I go back to South Carolina. I have seen Nicky twice, but I myself haven’t seen your younger kids. Bob took pictures of the day we said goodbye, and we did a family picture at the Abbey. I literally almost a...

A Friend I Once Had, And The Dogmatic Principle

 I once had a friend, a dear friend, who helped me with personal care needs in college. Reformed Presbyterian to the core. When I was a Reformed Presbyterian, I visited their church many times. We were close. I still consider his siblings my friends. (And siblings in the Lord.) Nevertheless, when I began to consider the claims of the Catholic Church to be the Church Christ founded, he took me out to breakfast. He implied--but never quite stated--that we would not be brothers, if I sought full communion with the Catholic Church. That came true; a couple years later, I called him on his birthday, as I'd done every year for close to ten of them. He didn't recognize my number, and it was the most strained, awkward phone call I have ever had. We haven't spoken since. We were close enough that I attended the rehearsal dinner for his wedding. His wife's uncle is a Catholic priest. I remember reading a blog post of theirs, that early in their relationship, she told him of the p...

My Thoughts On The Harrison Butker Commencement Speech

Update: I read the whole thing. I’m sorry, but what a weirdo. I thought you [Tom Darrow, of Denver, CO] made a trenchant case for why lockdowns are bad, and I definitely appreciated it. But a graduation speech is *not* the place for that. Secondly, this is an august event. It always is. I would never address the President of the United States in this manner. Never. Even the previous president, though he deserves it, if anyone does. Thirdly, the affirmations of Catholic identity should be more general. He has no authority to propound with specificity on all matters of great consequence. It has all the hallmarks of a culture war broadside, and again, a layman shouldn’t speak like this. The respect and reverence due the clergy is *always due,* even if they are weak, and outright wrong. We just don’t brush them aside like corrupt Mafia dons, to make a point. Fourthly, I don’t know where anyone gets the idea that the TLM is how God demands to be worshipped. The Church doesn’t teach that. ...