Skip to main content
OOOF! My school allows us to see individual assignment grades before the final grades come out, and it is ugly at points. I can't do math, but I think it'll be OK. I'd like to say that I am a real person, not a robot, and one with a physical disability at that. If you give me what amounts to "busy work," I have to make a choice. One thing I'm really proud of is the work I did in my Hebrew in Exegesis class on a word study paper (97) and the individual exegesis paper (88). I had already been aided by a 96 on the group exegesis paper, having teamed with "Deano" and "Exegetical Michael Jordan." I needed those, because that's the very class which worries me. Then again, I think now all I fear is the term GPA; if it was below 2.25, that will be the end of my studies. [There might not be any point in finishing.--ed.] Well, I've not decided to become Catholic, hermeneutical and ecclesiological doubts aside. [But it surely affected you--ed.] You're d--- right it did. I kept seeing the haggard lady from "The Princess Bride" shouting, "Schism! Boo! Boo!" "TT" has this joke he tells whenever enlightening us with some point of pre-Reformation history and anticipating the outcry from our more evangelical anti-Catholic brethren: "Don't you know the Church started in 1521?" And I must've heard him quote Jaroslav Pelikan 50 times: (possible paraphrase) "Traditionalism is the dead faith of the living; Tradition is the living faith of the dead." [Oddly papist for a Lutheran, no?--ed.] Yes. It reminded me one morning though of seeing three men in the front row at COK: The Reformed University Fellowship campus minister, an Anglican priest, and the director (or some fairly important dude) of Campus Crusade for Christ at MU. [Isn't this a PCA church?--ed.] I think so! Though it always felt a bit Anglican to me. [Minus the "extra" books.--ed.] Right. It might be a falsehood for us all to claim the Apostle's Creed as a point of unity given its context and meaning, but what a glorious conceit it is! And I predict that serious confessional Christians will have oddly uncomfortable and glorious opportunities for dialogue in the coming years that were not always there. [Side Rant: Can I just say that the cases of Hugh Latimer, Jan Hus, and the St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre really bother me? Pardon me if those "heresies" don't set me on fire quite like Docetism or Arianism. I'm definitely expecting to see those people in Heaven/New Earth, even if I am a papist. I wonder if there'll be a Texas Hold'Em game with those cats, Luther, Pope John Paul II, John Calvin, and Mother Theresa. I'd be happy to take a seat if/when I get there. [You sure Luther/Calvin will make it?--ed.] How can anyone be sure? But I verily have a soft spot for both of those Reformers. Even if they are schismatics. They seem like my kind of guys. For the record, I have absolutely zero sympathy for Servetus. I'm thankful that it isn't normal to execute heretics, in some sense. But if you're under a death sentence from the Catholics, Lutherans, and the Reformed, it may be a strong hint that you need to re-think your position. It's treated as some black mark against Calvin, when it's nothing of the sort. The only acceptable excuses for denying the Trinity are of the "I'm a lifelong Jew/Hindu/something else" variety. Sorry. But being some flavor of Protestant (especially in the 16th century) strikes me as a very understandable "mistake."] Anyway, we should be thankful that the way of the world is causing us all to question the wisdom of the Christian "family spat."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

We Don't Need No Magisterium: (Jason's Version) (But Actually, We Do)

Hilarious Com-Box Quote of The Day: "I was caught immediately because it is the Acts of the Apostles, not the Acts of the Holy Spirit Acting Erratically."--Donald Todd, reacting to the inartful opposition of the Holy Spirit and the Magisterium. Mark Galli, an editor at Christianity Today, had suggested that today's "confusion" in evangelicalism replicates a confusion on the day of Pentecost. Mr. Todd commented after this reply , and the original article is here. My thoughts: By what means was this Church-less "consensus" formed? If the Council did not possess the authority to adjudicate such questions, who does? If the Council Fathers did not intend to be the arbiters, why do they say that they do? At the risk of being rude, I would define evangelicalism as, "Whatever I want or need to believe at any particular time." Ecclesial authority to settle a particular question is a step forward, but only as long as, "God alone is Lord of the con...

Dear Alyse

 Today, you’re 35. Or at least you would be, in this place. You probably know this, but we’re OK. Not great, but OK. We know you wouldn’t want us moping around and weeping all the time. We try not to. Actually, I guess part of the problem is that you didn’t know how much we loved you. And that you didn’t know how to love yourself. I hope you have gotten to Love by now. Not a place, but fills everything in every way. I’m not Him, but he probably said, “Dear daughter/sister, you have been terribly hard on yourself. Rest now, and be at peace.” Anyway, teaching is going well, and I tell the kids all about you. They all say you are pretty. I usually can keep the boys from saying something gross for a few seconds. Mom and I are going to the game tonight. And like 6 more times, before I go back to South Carolina. I have seen Nicky twice, but I myself haven’t seen your younger kids. Bob took pictures of the day we said goodbye, and we did a family picture at the Abbey. I literally almost a...

Who Is Out Here Having Sex And Children With People They Don’t Like?

 And look, I’m not married. I’ve never been married. I have no children. I didn’t choose that; things just worked out that way. If you must know, I haven’t had sexual intercourse either. I probably should say “coitus,” so I am not arguing with some progressive activist about what “sexual intercourse” means. But I figured out from influencer videos or something what a “dead bedroom” was. Unless a couple mutually agrees that they don’t want to have sex/coitus anymore (hopefully to pray and serve) this is usually bad. I’ve known enough couples that it’s probably an indicator of trouble, especially for couples who are still able to have children. Is it really that wild to at least hope that Mr. and Mrs. Vance love each other? That a fourth child yet born at least might indicate that they enjoy each other?  Children are definitely not responsible for their parents’ happiness. That’s absolutely true. But wouldn’t any child hope their parents were happy, when they came into being? As...