Skip to main content
I made a fairly new friend, Deborah Lee, over the past year or so. She's a slightly younger, more Southern version of my mom, maybe. She's a musician/songwriter, so we get along well. Because I'm not trained in music, but I live in a very musical world. She's gonna come tomorrow and help me improve my singing. JK is pumped!

Deb was Reformed like me. Seminary trained as I was, she graduated from the same place I went. And now, she's Catholic. My way there was a little more linear, perhaps a shade more intellectual, but we live in the same relentlessly creative space. I didn't realize I was one of those people. I didn't see it. I honestly thought everyone wrote poems and songs in the middle of the night. I'd never say they were good. And there's no law saying you can't grind out such things on a schedule. But if you live in a universe where that fancy could strike any time, and that seems normal to you, you're an artist. You're a hippie. And the faster you come to terms with it, the easier life will be. I had baggage; I associated artistry and general creative hippie-dom with left-wing politics and stupid people.

And then I found myself in Alequippa, PA or thereabouts, dropping off a friend. [Let's cut the crap; she was a hot girl.--ed.] Fine. But it was a good trip, anyway. And she's definitely a friend. And when I returned, I wanted to thank her mother for opening her home to us. So I did so in an e-mail. She appreciated my sentiments, and said, "Have you thought of being a writer?" I will never forget this.

Some five years later, I'm sitting in a class somewhat redundantly called, "Calling, Vocation, and Work." The final project was to analyze a career through the basic lenses of the biblical story: Creation, Fall, Redemption, and Consummation. My heart burned within me; I knew exactly what calling I wanted to think about. It was the thing I wanted to do, to be: a writer. I remembered a scene from one of my favorite movies, where the characters discuss the basic insight of the poet Jose Maria Rilke. He told a young person essentially, "If you wake up and your first thought is about X, then you are X." If you want, you could dismiss it as trite guidance counselor stuff, but I think the opposite is true. We've all been given gifts for a reason. It might be true that we have to do something we hate for a time out of necessity. But I think our culture tells us to be "practical" because it hates joy. It hates service. For all the talk of freedom, the one thing this culture can't stand is people who are happy. They'll be happy to give you drugs or sex to pretend to be happy. But please don't really mean it. This is why most people now think irony and humor are the same thing. If you're not cynical, people look at you funny.

I'm a hippie, trying to monetize this mindless blather (and other blather) for my own good. I just didn't see it. I thought I was crazy. I'm not crazy; this world is crazy. It's been Opposite Day for most of human history. Jesus came to set us straight. There is a fine line between tragic absurdity and hilarity, and this blog is a testimony to that, God-willing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

We Don't Need No Magisterium: (Jason's Version) (But Actually, We Do)

Hilarious Com-Box Quote of The Day: "I was caught immediately because it is the Acts of the Apostles, not the Acts of the Holy Spirit Acting Erratically."--Donald Todd, reacting to the inartful opposition of the Holy Spirit and the Magisterium. Mark Galli, an editor at Christianity Today, had suggested that today's "confusion" in evangelicalism replicates a confusion on the day of Pentecost. Mr. Todd commented after this reply , and the original article is here. My thoughts: By what means was this Church-less "consensus" formed? If the Council did not possess the authority to adjudicate such questions, who does? If the Council Fathers did not intend to be the arbiters, why do they say that they do? At the risk of being rude, I would define evangelicalism as, "Whatever I want or need to believe at any particular time." Ecclesial authority to settle a particular question is a step forward, but only as long as, "God alone is Lord of the con...

Dear Alyse

 Today, you’re 35. Or at least you would be, in this place. You probably know this, but we’re OK. Not great, but OK. We know you wouldn’t want us moping around and weeping all the time. We try not to. Actually, I guess part of the problem is that you didn’t know how much we loved you. And that you didn’t know how to love yourself. I hope you have gotten to Love by now. Not a place, but fills everything in every way. I’m not Him, but he probably said, “Dear daughter/sister, you have been terribly hard on yourself. Rest now, and be at peace.” Anyway, teaching is going well, and I tell the kids all about you. They all say you are pretty. I usually can keep the boys from saying something gross for a few seconds. Mom and I are going to the game tonight. And like 6 more times, before I go back to South Carolina. I have seen Nicky twice, but I myself haven’t seen your younger kids. Bob took pictures of the day we said goodbye, and we did a family picture at the Abbey. I literally almost a...

Who Is Out Here Having Sex And Children With People They Don’t Like?

 And look, I’m not married. I’ve never been married. I have no children. I didn’t choose that; things just worked out that way. If you must know, I haven’t had sexual intercourse either. I probably should say “coitus,” so I am not arguing with some progressive activist about what “sexual intercourse” means. But I figured out from influencer videos or something what a “dead bedroom” was. Unless a couple mutually agrees that they don’t want to have sex/coitus anymore (hopefully to pray and serve) this is usually bad. I’ve known enough couples that it’s probably an indicator of trouble, especially for couples who are still able to have children. Is it really that wild to at least hope that Mr. and Mrs. Vance love each other? That a fourth child yet born at least might indicate that they enjoy each other?  Children are definitely not responsible for their parents’ happiness. That’s absolutely true. But wouldn’t any child hope their parents were happy, when they came into being? As...