Skip to main content

Kamala Harris Thoughts

 I’ll try to be nice. Shouldn’t be that hard. I don’t think I’ve had any persistently negative thoughts about her. She’s beautiful. She is. I hadn’t fully decided to abstain from voting for president until very late that year she became the Democratic nominee, and I’ll just admit that I never minded seeing her on the TV. I’m just girl crazy, and that’s never going to change. I have been completely in love with three women in my life (possibly four) whilst having those feelings returned in some respect. Two out of the three were Black, or from the Indian subcontinent. Harris is both at once. I imagine that twenty years ago, she had most men tripping all over themselves. Mr. Emhoff has learned some grace for these guys (and probably some women) because unless Michelle Obama walks in, he’s the envy of the room.

She seemed nervous on a national stage to me. I do think that potentially becoming the second Black president and the first woman president adds a special pressure that we could see. I have no time for the idea that her winning was impossible because of her sex or background; I think we’re as ready as we’ll ever be. But she didn’t come across well. (If Usha Vance and I ever met, I would probably blush, giggle, and roll away. That would then become the most awkward conversation that Vice President Vance ever had: “I’m sorry, Mr. Vice President! But I mean, obviously, you get it, right?”)

Probably the biggest problem for Harris was turning her Twitter account into a Planned Parenthood commercial for the last month of the campaign. People who are sane don’t like abortion. The debate about the harms of outlawing it in every state is actually a completely different discussion. “Reproductive choice” is a deflection, and it’s a rhetorical sledgehammer that prevents the wielder from cooperating with anyone who might want to tackle poverty, rape, and a lack of educational and economic opportunity. If it’s not regrettable, don’t say we need less of it. Plenty of people are willing to help you get less abortion. But Democrats elected haven’t wanted less. Planned Parenthood has more than enough money to change minds on the issue. And Emily’s List. And whatever NARAL is now. Al Gore. Jesse Jackson. And quite a few others saw the money, and literally abandoned their own convictions.

I won’t even say that everyone who says they’re pro-life is consistent. The children who die with Downs before they breathe on their own were probably conceived in some numbers by people who claim to be pro-life. It’s just math; we might soon not have anyone living with Downs, and it’s not because the world got any easier.

Sometimes, moral certitude can only be sustained by youthful ignorance. Everyone violates their principles at some point. But sins become tragedies only at the highest stakes.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

We Don't Need No Magisterium: (Jason's Version) (But Actually, We Do)

Hilarious Com-Box Quote of The Day: "I was caught immediately because it is the Acts of the Apostles, not the Acts of the Holy Spirit Acting Erratically."--Donald Todd, reacting to the inartful opposition of the Holy Spirit and the Magisterium. Mark Galli, an editor at Christianity Today, had suggested that today's "confusion" in evangelicalism replicates a confusion on the day of Pentecost. Mr. Todd commented after this reply , and the original article is here. My thoughts: By what means was this Church-less "consensus" formed? If the Council did not possess the authority to adjudicate such questions, who does? If the Council Fathers did not intend to be the arbiters, why do they say that they do? At the risk of being rude, I would define evangelicalism as, "Whatever I want or need to believe at any particular time." Ecclesial authority to settle a particular question is a step forward, but only as long as, "God alone is Lord of the con...

Dear Alyse

 Today, you’re 35. Or at least you would be, in this place. You probably know this, but we’re OK. Not great, but OK. We know you wouldn’t want us moping around and weeping all the time. We try not to. Actually, I guess part of the problem is that you didn’t know how much we loved you. And that you didn’t know how to love yourself. I hope you have gotten to Love by now. Not a place, but fills everything in every way. I’m not Him, but he probably said, “Dear daughter/sister, you have been terribly hard on yourself. Rest now, and be at peace.” Anyway, teaching is going well, and I tell the kids all about you. They all say you are pretty. I usually can keep the boys from saying something gross for a few seconds. Mom and I are going to the game tonight. And like 6 more times, before I go back to South Carolina. I have seen Nicky twice, but I myself haven’t seen your younger kids. Bob took pictures of the day we said goodbye, and we did a family picture at the Abbey. I literally almost a...

Who Is Out Here Having Sex And Children With People They Don’t Like?

 And look, I’m not married. I’ve never been married. I have no children. I didn’t choose that; things just worked out that way. If you must know, I haven’t had sexual intercourse either. I probably should say “coitus,” so I am not arguing with some progressive activist about what “sexual intercourse” means. But I figured out from influencer videos or something what a “dead bedroom” was. Unless a couple mutually agrees that they don’t want to have sex/coitus anymore (hopefully to pray and serve) this is usually bad. I’ve known enough couples that it’s probably an indicator of trouble, especially for couples who are still able to have children. Is it really that wild to at least hope that Mr. and Mrs. Vance love each other? That a fourth child yet born at least might indicate that they enjoy each other?  Children are definitely not responsible for their parents’ happiness. That’s absolutely true. But wouldn’t any child hope their parents were happy, when they came into being? As...