Skip to main content

Doug Wilson Is Scary And Bad

 When I was about 20, I used to read him on occasion. I was Reformed, and a Federal Vision sympathizer. Of course I was; I didn’t know it, but I was a writer. And if you’re a little bit artsy-fartsy like that, you’re a crypto-Catholic, even if you’re not ready to submit to Rome.

It’s legit a kind of Oxford Movement within Reformed theology; that’s what it was; that’s what it is. I was smart enough to know that Western civilization is Catholic civilization. America is a bit anomalous, but let’s be real: the Anglican Communion at the time of the death of St. Thomas More was just the SSPX of its day: Catholics separated from their visible Head on Earth.

Anyway, I laughed at a lot at the Wilson snark, because even a lot of liberal Christians at the time acted like President Bush was a Christian Ayatollah. C’mon, man. This dude from Old Money, whose relatives seemingly own a third of New England? Other than the Calvinist Congregationalists, the region is not known for its excess of religious enthusiasm. There’s a reason still most of the presidents are Episcopalian; that’s where orderly Old Money worships.

But the Trump Era is typified by a lack of decorum, and Wilson’s mask got thrown away ages ago. Sometimes decorum prevents things that should be said from being said. Most times, though, decorum reminds us that we can be better. Bushes are good people; I definitely believe that. And “W” is the kind of man who forces guys like Wilson to at least pretend respectability. Now, arguments about politics and culture are often a street fight.

The Lost Cause crap was always there; I might say I should have seen it, but I might have been 22 when I stopped paying attention to him. I believe he hates women outright; his kindness and affection for any group of them depends only upon how they serve him. All these accusations and facts of sexual abuse, rape, and coverups prove all of that. That’s one of the beauties of resting in Holy Mother Church: I don’t have to rush to the defense of some “Christian conservative,” because “the libs” are after him. HE is a sexist; I’m just a passionate guy with a low tolerance for BS.

(I don’t hate liberals, either. I wish to meet Bryan Stevenson [“Just Mercy”] and Sister Helen Prejean, [“Dead Man Walking”] before we lose her. Both those books are “weep on the pages” kind of books, for anyone with a soul. I have made donations to Equal Justice Initiative, because I happen to think poor people deserve vigorous legal defense, regardless. So, Dr. Mary McCampbell and anyone else: if you’re going to put me with the “deplorables,” you’d better bring receipts. My guess is, you might not have enough people who tell you you’re wrong.)

Anyway, Doug Wilson is bad news.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

We Don't Need No Magisterium: (Jason's Version) (But Actually, We Do)

Hilarious Com-Box Quote of The Day: "I was caught immediately because it is the Acts of the Apostles, not the Acts of the Holy Spirit Acting Erratically."--Donald Todd, reacting to the inartful opposition of the Holy Spirit and the Magisterium. Mark Galli, an editor at Christianity Today, had suggested that today's "confusion" in evangelicalism replicates a confusion on the day of Pentecost. Mr. Todd commented after this reply , and the original article is here. My thoughts: By what means was this Church-less "consensus" formed? If the Council did not possess the authority to adjudicate such questions, who does? If the Council Fathers did not intend to be the arbiters, why do they say that they do? At the risk of being rude, I would define evangelicalism as, "Whatever I want or need to believe at any particular time." Ecclesial authority to settle a particular question is a step forward, but only as long as, "God alone is Lord of the con...

Dear Alyse

 Today, you’re 35. Or at least you would be, in this place. You probably know this, but we’re OK. Not great, but OK. We know you wouldn’t want us moping around and weeping all the time. We try not to. Actually, I guess part of the problem is that you didn’t know how much we loved you. And that you didn’t know how to love yourself. I hope you have gotten to Love by now. Not a place, but fills everything in every way. I’m not Him, but he probably said, “Dear daughter/sister, you have been terribly hard on yourself. Rest now, and be at peace.” Anyway, teaching is going well, and I tell the kids all about you. They all say you are pretty. I usually can keep the boys from saying something gross for a few seconds. Mom and I are going to the game tonight. And like 6 more times, before I go back to South Carolina. I have seen Nicky twice, but I myself haven’t seen your younger kids. Bob took pictures of the day we said goodbye, and we did a family picture at the Abbey. I literally almost a...

Who Is Out Here Having Sex And Children With People They Don’t Like?

 And look, I’m not married. I’ve never been married. I have no children. I didn’t choose that; things just worked out that way. If you must know, I haven’t had sexual intercourse either. I probably should say “coitus,” so I am not arguing with some progressive activist about what “sexual intercourse” means. But I figured out from influencer videos or something what a “dead bedroom” was. Unless a couple mutually agrees that they don’t want to have sex/coitus anymore (hopefully to pray and serve) this is usually bad. I’ve known enough couples that it’s probably an indicator of trouble, especially for couples who are still able to have children. Is it really that wild to at least hope that Mr. and Mrs. Vance love each other? That a fourth child yet born at least might indicate that they enjoy each other?  Children are definitely not responsible for their parents’ happiness. That’s absolutely true. But wouldn’t any child hope their parents were happy, when they came into being? As...