Skip to main content

Speaking Of The Rat

 I read all of Aaron “The Rat” Nelson’s posts on Facebook, and I venture to say that if he becomes one with The Borg—let the reader understand—that a bunch of our priests are going to tell him to chill out.

I suppose indeed it is the mark of a saint to blame yourself first and primarily, but it’s also the hallmark of saints to tell the truth. The good that God has wrought cannot be muted in the blather of false humility and self-deprecation.

I remain thankful that he has a burning antipathy for Calvinism, ironically enough. He’d denigrate himself even more if he spent the last 25 years in those waters. Bryan Cross and I both were Reformed at one point. Since Bryan is about 3 times smarter than I am, I assume he understood it better than I did to that degree.

I’m just a Bible guy; I don’t think logically enough to be naturally good at systematic or dogmatic theology. The supernatural gifts of the Holy Spirit I think make me able to put mental citation “tags” on things. I said when I was a teenager that books are like ice cream flavors; every different one is a different flavor. But certain popular novels I have read, I can probably recite. God the Holy Spirit has used my powers of retention to make me a good teacher.

A teacher is how I think of myself. “Theologian” sounds pompous in my ears. The Bible is God’s love letter to humanity, and though faith clarifies it and gives it meaning, I actually try to teach it the same way I would teach another book, with one modification: I believe and know that the divine author is trying to commune with everyone. He’s not going to be like a novelist and say, “I don’t know, what does it mean to you?”

Someone might say, “You’re a Catholic; aren’t you just outsourcing your Bible interpretation to the Magisterium? CCC, 100. No. I think considering the most relevant papal encyclicals on Sacred Scripture, we can make a few points:

1. The Church wants the Christian people to read the Scriptures;

2. When biblical scholarship juxtaposes the human authors and the human context against faith, then it becomes a problem;

3. There is no error or fault in communication in the Bible. God cannot err, and He cannot fail;

4. With respect to the Reformation, there are a range of interpretations which piety and obedience incline one towards either remaining in the Church, or seeking full communion with her. True interpretations only keep one separated, if return is not considered.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

We Don't Need No Magisterium: (Jason's Version) (But Actually, We Do)

Hilarious Com-Box Quote of The Day: "I was caught immediately because it is the Acts of the Apostles, not the Acts of the Holy Spirit Acting Erratically."--Donald Todd, reacting to the inartful opposition of the Holy Spirit and the Magisterium. Mark Galli, an editor at Christianity Today, had suggested that today's "confusion" in evangelicalism replicates a confusion on the day of Pentecost. Mr. Todd commented after this reply , and the original article is here. My thoughts: By what means was this Church-less "consensus" formed? If the Council did not possess the authority to adjudicate such questions, who does? If the Council Fathers did not intend to be the arbiters, why do they say that they do? At the risk of being rude, I would define evangelicalism as, "Whatever I want or need to believe at any particular time." Ecclesial authority to settle a particular question is a step forward, but only as long as, "God alone is Lord of the con...

Dear Alyse

 Today, you’re 35. Or at least you would be, in this place. You probably know this, but we’re OK. Not great, but OK. We know you wouldn’t want us moping around and weeping all the time. We try not to. Actually, I guess part of the problem is that you didn’t know how much we loved you. And that you didn’t know how to love yourself. I hope you have gotten to Love by now. Not a place, but fills everything in every way. I’m not Him, but he probably said, “Dear daughter/sister, you have been terribly hard on yourself. Rest now, and be at peace.” Anyway, teaching is going well, and I tell the kids all about you. They all say you are pretty. I usually can keep the boys from saying something gross for a few seconds. Mom and I are going to the game tonight. And like 6 more times, before I go back to South Carolina. I have seen Nicky twice, but I myself haven’t seen your younger kids. Bob took pictures of the day we said goodbye, and we did a family picture at the Abbey. I literally almost a...

Who Is Out Here Having Sex And Children With People They Don’t Like?

 And look, I’m not married. I’ve never been married. I have no children. I didn’t choose that; things just worked out that way. If you must know, I haven’t had sexual intercourse either. I probably should say “coitus,” so I am not arguing with some progressive activist about what “sexual intercourse” means. But I figured out from influencer videos or something what a “dead bedroom” was. Unless a couple mutually agrees that they don’t want to have sex/coitus anymore (hopefully to pray and serve) this is usually bad. I’ve known enough couples that it’s probably an indicator of trouble, especially for couples who are still able to have children. Is it really that wild to at least hope that Mr. and Mrs. Vance love each other? That a fourth child yet born at least might indicate that they enjoy each other?  Children are definitely not responsible for their parents’ happiness. That’s absolutely true. But wouldn’t any child hope their parents were happy, when they came into being? As...