Skip to main content

I Don’t Know What To Call It

 I just have this crazy belief that people are responsible for the things they do. They might not be fully responsible, or we might say, culpable. Medical reasons come in here, and in principle, I have no objection.

We’re going toward the idea that everything is medical, and that no one is responsible for their decisions. If you ask me why I don’t fit in as a Democrat and progressive, this is why.

Don’t misunderstand me: I think we should do a lot more to support vulnerable people. But those same people prefer stacking programs on top of programs that don’t actually pay for anything, just to seem like better people than their opponents, which (to be fair) doesn’t seem hard to do. I’ll probably be on the same Medicaid waiting list until I am dead.

There was a school shooting in Oregon. A guy once served by special education, returning to “punish” those who helped him. They must exist, but I have never met a bad special education teacher in my life. Those are, on the whole, wonderful people. As you would expect.

I don’t know what a “country that does nothing about guns” or shootings is supposed to mean. And I am not trying to be obtuse. It seems like an irrational emotional reaction to something horrible. I don’t think anyone moved to ban crucifixes or to jail carpenters when that poor priest died the other day.

One thing handguns absolutely do is erase strength imbalances. That’s why women carry firearms for safety. In my cynicism, I’ll enjoy watching the misandrist, feminist, transgender activists and anti-gun activists try to all figure out what they believe.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

We Don't Need No Magisterium: (Jason's Version) (But Actually, We Do)

Hilarious Com-Box Quote of The Day: "I was caught immediately because it is the Acts of the Apostles, not the Acts of the Holy Spirit Acting Erratically."--Donald Todd, reacting to the inartful opposition of the Holy Spirit and the Magisterium. Mark Galli, an editor at Christianity Today, had suggested that today's "confusion" in evangelicalism replicates a confusion on the day of Pentecost. Mr. Todd commented after this reply , and the original article is here. My thoughts: By what means was this Church-less "consensus" formed? If the Council did not possess the authority to adjudicate such questions, who does? If the Council Fathers did not intend to be the arbiters, why do they say that they do? At the risk of being rude, I would define evangelicalism as, "Whatever I want or need to believe at any particular time." Ecclesial authority to settle a particular question is a step forward, but only as long as, "God alone is Lord of the con...

What I Should Have Said

 I was functionally fired from my teaching job in November, 2024, after an unjust administrative "process" initiated by HR , and triggered by false accusations the content of which I was never told. My "defense" therefore could have no reasonable basis or direction. I won't say the name of the Local Education Agency, but the town where I lived and worked was Cheraw, South Carolina. I think that once I was on administrative leave, they could use nearly any indiscretion of mine as the final straw to remove me. I did connect with students on social media in protest, and I did express hope that I would quickly be returned to the classroom. The principal of the high school where I worked--a true lackey of the bureaucracy, and fully committed to educational ideas, methods, and solutions that don't work--also allowed his personal dislike of me to take the form of a belief that I was a substandard teacher. He gave me an unsatisfactory review on October 12, and we ha...

Who Is Out Here Having Sex And Children With People They Don’t Like?

 And look, I’m not married. I’ve never been married. I have no children. I didn’t choose that; things just worked out that way. If you must know, I haven’t had sexual intercourse either. I probably should say “coitus,” so I am not arguing with some progressive activist about what “sexual intercourse” means. But I figured out from influencer videos or something what a “dead bedroom” was. Unless a couple mutually agrees that they don’t want to have sex/coitus anymore (hopefully to pray and serve) this is usually bad. I’ve known enough couples that it’s probably an indicator of trouble, especially for couples who are still able to have children. Is it really that wild to at least hope that Mr. and Mrs. Vance love each other? That a fourth child yet born at least might indicate that they enjoy each other?  Children are definitely not responsible for their parents’ happiness. That’s absolutely true. But wouldn’t any child hope their parents were happy, when they came into being? As...