Skip to main content

Mandy Patinkin, Great American

 On the one hand, artist types need to realize that conservative people don’t want their opinions on political matters. It’s probably not fair, but conservatives and Republicans generally think they know more about what matters than liberals do. Some liberals and progressives can’t even fathom this, since (apparently) they think anyone not them is just as stupid. You may have noticed: people don’t cower in shame; they dig in deeper, in the face of contempt and mockery.

Back to Mandy Patinkin: I love him. I don’t know him, obviously. That being said, I love him. And people with different temperaments than me hate self-important actors who pretend for a living and cry a lot. Not me. Every time I hear him talk, I think, “There’s my friend.” He’s way more political than Dolly Parton ever was, but don’t kid yourself: that dude is beloved. And he bloody well deserves it.

I couldn’t help myself; I stuck up for Mandy on the Twitter. I know a priest who’s probably more politically conservative than me, and there was a video of Mandy telling Michiganders to vote for El-Sayed for US Senate. Mandy’s not from Michigan, and that candidate wouldn’t be my first choice for any office. But that’s my friend, man. I know, I’m insane. But I can tell you: I feel like Mandy Patinkin has been there for me at the worst times in my life. Remember how we felt when Robin Williams died? Same deal, man. Sorry not sorry.

I saw a clip of Mamdani being inaugurated mayor of New York City. You don’t have to like him; it’s politics. But there he is, with the kids’ chorus from PS 22 (Of course I follow them on Facebook. What kind of stupid question is that?) and they are singing “Somewhere Over The Rainbow” with Mandy Patinkin. Incredible. You couldn’t have had better optics if Mamdani resurrected Mr. Rogers.

Have we given him the Kennedy Center Honors yet? Presidential Medal of Freedom? Something?

I don’t care if he’s literally wrong about everything. Because that’s my friend.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

We Don't Need No Magisterium: (Jason's Version) (But Actually, We Do)

Hilarious Com-Box Quote of The Day: "I was caught immediately because it is the Acts of the Apostles, not the Acts of the Holy Spirit Acting Erratically."--Donald Todd, reacting to the inartful opposition of the Holy Spirit and the Magisterium. Mark Galli, an editor at Christianity Today, had suggested that today's "confusion" in evangelicalism replicates a confusion on the day of Pentecost. Mr. Todd commented after this reply , and the original article is here. My thoughts: By what means was this Church-less "consensus" formed? If the Council did not possess the authority to adjudicate such questions, who does? If the Council Fathers did not intend to be the arbiters, why do they say that they do? At the risk of being rude, I would define evangelicalism as, "Whatever I want or need to believe at any particular time." Ecclesial authority to settle a particular question is a step forward, but only as long as, "God alone is Lord of the con...

What I Should Have Said

 I was functionally fired from my teaching job in November, 2024, after an unjust administrative "process" initiated by HR , and triggered by false accusations the content of which I was never told. My "defense" therefore could have no reasonable basis or direction. I won't say the name of the Local Education Agency, but the town where I lived and worked was Cheraw, South Carolina. I think that once I was on administrative leave, they could use nearly any indiscretion of mine as the final straw to remove me. I did connect with students on social media in protest, and I did express hope that I would quickly be returned to the classroom. The principal of the high school where I worked--a true lackey of the bureaucracy, and fully committed to educational ideas, methods, and solutions that don't work--also allowed his personal dislike of me to take the form of a belief that I was a substandard teacher. He gave me an unsatisfactory review on October 12, and we ha...

Who Is Out Here Having Sex And Children With People They Don’t Like?

 And look, I’m not married. I’ve never been married. I have no children. I didn’t choose that; things just worked out that way. If you must know, I haven’t had sexual intercourse either. I probably should say “coitus,” so I am not arguing with some progressive activist about what “sexual intercourse” means. But I figured out from influencer videos or something what a “dead bedroom” was. Unless a couple mutually agrees that they don’t want to have sex/coitus anymore (hopefully to pray and serve) this is usually bad. I’ve known enough couples that it’s probably an indicator of trouble, especially for couples who are still able to have children. Is it really that wild to at least hope that Mr. and Mrs. Vance love each other? That a fourth child yet born at least might indicate that they enjoy each other?  Children are definitely not responsible for their parents’ happiness. That’s absolutely true. But wouldn’t any child hope their parents were happy, when they came into being? As...