Skip to main content

How In The World…?

 I know young people and everyone else for that matter just (apparently) has sex whenever they feel like it. Christians fornicate and cohabitate worse than the heathen these days. I also definitely recognize that mistakes and “accidents” happen. If I didn’t believe in forgiveness, I would be by definition the stupidest disciple of Jesus who ever existed. A disciple knows first above everything and everyone that his debt with God is bigger than anyone else’s. He extends mercy to other sinners because he believes he is the chief of sinners.

All that said…

How in the Sam Hill are you gonna make a baby, and then decide—while your age starts with a “1” or barely a “2”—that this isn’t going to work out, and you’ll go find someone else to have sex with? This serial monogamy stuff is just nuts, man. There are things even more nuts, but I cannot fathom a more painful question for a child, and from a child, than, “How come Daddy isn’t here with us?” Or worse, “Who is my Daddy?”

Believe me, not every couple should even attempt to “make it work.” But on behalf of every kid of a single parent, divorced parents, et cetera, the question is hanging out there, demanding to be asked, and answered: “Who do you people think you are? What is wrong with you?” I don’t have an answer.

Maybe it’s easy for me to say. I’m just a cripple, and to be completely honest, I haven’t fit in well with the abled and ableist world to begin with. I’ve rarely had a chance to screw up my life with a night of passion, especially with “no strings attached.” Then again, if guys that have worse CP than I do can find sex workers, I could have done the same, I suppose. One lady who told her story with The Moth took her son to Vegas so he could have sex with a professional. I sympathize, in a way. But my goodness, I don’t understand the furtive, half-arsed nature of treating sex like eating, and worse, bending the world to your whim, when it blows up in your face.

You know what else is messed up? A woman who sells sex for money is a whore, but “man-whore” is a punchline. Feminism is right about one thing: Men would destroy women in the main, before they took accountability for themselves, if we let them.

And that brings us to the “incels.” “Involuntary celibates,” to spell it out. It’s bad to have sex with people to whom you’re not married. But it’s only “involuntary” because you’re entitled and selfish (and possibly dangerous). For the scores of entitled, selfish, superficial women—and they do absolutely exist—no one is entitled without qualification or consent to the body of another person. Why do I even have to say this? I don’t know how long I’ll be single. Maybe until I die. But if anything, let me yearn without bitterness, and without malice. If I’m a “simp,” so be it. The only thing worse than missing eternal happiness would be a firm determination to be unhappy here, and ending up with Hell the entire time.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dear Alyse

 Today, you’re 35. Or at least you would be, in this place. You probably know this, but we’re OK. Not great, but OK. We know you wouldn’t want us moping around and weeping all the time. We try not to. Actually, I guess part of the problem is that you didn’t know how much we loved you. And that you didn’t know how to love yourself. I hope you have gotten to Love by now. Not a place, but fills everything in every way. I’m not Him, but he probably said, “Dear daughter/sister, you have been terribly hard on yourself. Rest now, and be at peace.” Anyway, teaching is going well, and I tell the kids all about you. They all say you are pretty. I usually can keep the boys from saying something gross for a few seconds. Mom and I are going to the game tonight. And like 6 more times, before I go back to South Carolina. I have seen Nicky twice, but I myself haven’t seen your younger kids. Bob took pictures of the day we said goodbye, and we did a family picture at the Abbey. I literally almost a...
Hilarious Com-Box Quote of The Day: "I was caught immediately because it is the Acts of the Apostles, not the Acts of the Holy Spirit Acting Erratically."--Donald Todd, reacting to the inartful opposition of the Holy Spirit and the Magisterium. Mark Galli, an editor at Christianity Today, had suggested that today's "confusion" in evangelicalism replicates a confusion on the day of Pentecost. Mr. Todd commented after this reply , and the original article is here. My thoughts: By what means was this Church-less "consensus" formed? If the Council did not possess the authority to adjudicate such questions, who does? If the Council Fathers did not intend to be the arbiters, why do they say that they do? At the risk of being rude, I would define evangelicalism as, "Whatever I want or need to believe at any particular time." Ecclesial authority to settle a particular question is a step forward, but only as long as, "God alone is Lord of the con...

A Friend I Once Had, And The Dogmatic Principle

 I once had a friend, a dear friend, who helped me with personal care needs in college. Reformed Presbyterian to the core. When I was a Reformed Presbyterian, I visited their church many times. We were close. I still consider his siblings my friends. (And siblings in the Lord.) Nevertheless, when I began to consider the claims of the Catholic Church to be the Church Christ founded, he took me out to breakfast. He implied--but never quite stated--that we would not be brothers, if I sought full communion with the Catholic Church. That came true; a couple years later, I called him on his birthday, as I'd done every year for close to ten of them. He didn't recognize my number, and it was the most strained, awkward phone call I have ever had. We haven't spoken since. We were close enough that I attended the rehearsal dinner for his wedding. His wife's uncle is a Catholic priest. I remember reading a blog post of theirs, that early in their relationship, she told him of the p...