Skip to main content

How In The World…?

 I know young people and everyone else for that matter just (apparently) has sex whenever they feel like it. Christians fornicate and cohabitate worse than the heathen these days. I also definitely recognize that mistakes and “accidents” happen. If I didn’t believe in forgiveness, I would be by definition the stupidest disciple of Jesus who ever existed. A disciple knows first above everything and everyone that his debt with God is bigger than anyone else’s. He extends mercy to other sinners because he believes he is the chief of sinners.

All that said…

How in the Sam Hill are you gonna make a baby, and then decide—while your age starts with a “1” or barely a “2”—that this isn’t going to work out, and you’ll go find someone else to have sex with? This serial monogamy stuff is just nuts, man. There are things even more nuts, but I cannot fathom a more painful question for a child, and from a child, than, “How come Daddy isn’t here with us?” Or worse, “Who is my Daddy?”

Believe me, not every couple should even attempt to “make it work.” But on behalf of every kid of a single parent, divorced parents, et cetera, the question is hanging out there, demanding to be asked, and answered: “Who do you people think you are? What is wrong with you?” I don’t have an answer.

Maybe it’s easy for me to say. I’m just a cripple, and to be completely honest, I haven’t fit in well with the abled and ableist world to begin with. I’ve rarely had a chance to screw up my life with a night of passion, especially with “no strings attached.” Then again, if guys that have worse CP than I do can find sex workers, I could have done the same, I suppose. One lady who told her story with The Moth took her son to Vegas so he could have sex with a professional. I sympathize, in a way. But my goodness, I don’t understand the furtive, half-arsed nature of treating sex like eating, and worse, bending the world to your whim, when it blows up in your face.

You know what else is messed up? A woman who sells sex for money is a whore, but “man-whore” is a punchline. Feminism is right about one thing: Men would destroy women in the main, before they took accountability for themselves, if we let them.

And that brings us to the “incels.” “Involuntary celibates,” to spell it out. It’s bad to have sex with people to whom you’re not married. But it’s only “involuntary” because you’re entitled and selfish (and possibly dangerous). For the scores of entitled, selfish, superficial women—and they do absolutely exist—no one is entitled without qualification or consent to the body of another person. Why do I even have to say this? I don’t know how long I’ll be single. Maybe until I die. But if anything, let me yearn without bitterness, and without malice. If I’m a “simp,” so be it. The only thing worse than missing eternal happiness would be a firm determination to be unhappy here, and ending up with Hell the entire time.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

We Don't Need No Magisterium: (Jason's Version) (But Actually, We Do)

Hilarious Com-Box Quote of The Day: "I was caught immediately because it is the Acts of the Apostles, not the Acts of the Holy Spirit Acting Erratically."--Donald Todd, reacting to the inartful opposition of the Holy Spirit and the Magisterium. Mark Galli, an editor at Christianity Today, had suggested that today's "confusion" in evangelicalism replicates a confusion on the day of Pentecost. Mr. Todd commented after this reply , and the original article is here. My thoughts: By what means was this Church-less "consensus" formed? If the Council did not possess the authority to adjudicate such questions, who does? If the Council Fathers did not intend to be the arbiters, why do they say that they do? At the risk of being rude, I would define evangelicalism as, "Whatever I want or need to believe at any particular time." Ecclesial authority to settle a particular question is a step forward, but only as long as, "God alone is Lord of the con...

What I Should Have Said

 I was functionally fired from my teaching job in November, 2024, after an unjust administrative "process" initiated by HR , and triggered by false accusations the content of which I was never told. My "defense" therefore could have no reasonable basis or direction. I won't say the name of the Local Education Agency, but the town where I lived and worked was Cheraw, South Carolina. I think that once I was on administrative leave, they could use nearly any indiscretion of mine as the final straw to remove me. I did connect with students on social media in protest, and I did express hope that I would quickly be returned to the classroom. The principal of the high school where I worked--a true lackey of the bureaucracy, and fully committed to educational ideas, methods, and solutions that don't work--also allowed his personal dislike of me to take the form of a belief that I was a substandard teacher. He gave me an unsatisfactory review on October 12, and we ha...

Who Is Out Here Having Sex And Children With People They Don’t Like?

 And look, I’m not married. I’ve never been married. I have no children. I didn’t choose that; things just worked out that way. If you must know, I haven’t had sexual intercourse either. I probably should say “coitus,” so I am not arguing with some progressive activist about what “sexual intercourse” means. But I figured out from influencer videos or something what a “dead bedroom” was. Unless a couple mutually agrees that they don’t want to have sex/coitus anymore (hopefully to pray and serve) this is usually bad. I’ve known enough couples that it’s probably an indicator of trouble, especially for couples who are still able to have children. Is it really that wild to at least hope that Mr. and Mrs. Vance love each other? That a fourth child yet born at least might indicate that they enjoy each other?  Children are definitely not responsible for their parents’ happiness. That’s absolutely true. But wouldn’t any child hope their parents were happy, when they came into being? As...