Skip to main content

You’re Not A Lay Minister; You’re Deputized To Assist The Clergy

 The official terms liturgically are that bishops, priests, and deacons are the “ordinary ministers of Holy Communion.” Anyone else who helps in this way or in any other way is an extraordinary minister. Respectfully, in an ideal scenario, you wouldn’t be there. So please do it reverently and efficiently by all means. But ideally, the faithful shouldn’t notice you.

It is also the case that people with bad motives and the ignorant use the provisions and permissions for less-than-ideal situations to introduce their wrong ideas into the liturgy. More than a few people need to hear, “Hey friend. You could literally go to Hell for stuff like that.”

“Active participation” does not mean, “As many of us as possible need to do stuff in the liturgy.” It means that we know the significance of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. We are trying to be prayerfully aware of what the priest is doing, and to offer our own selves as distinct sacrifices to God. This is where the “and yours” in the vernacular of the Mass of Paul VI is a bit imprecise in English: there are two distinct types of sacrifices going on: the priest offering Christ, and the laity offering themselves. If we’re not really paying attention, we could think we’re helping the celebrant with the Sacrifice. Sentimental, but wrong.

But a note on altar girls and lectors of both sexes: I don’t care. We’re absolutely not getting that toothpaste back in the proverbial tube. There is no obvious and direct relationship between being an altar boy, and being a priest. Earlier generations, maybe. But any kid is going to understand that the liturgy, humble as it may seem, is the most important thing we will do in any given week, on any given day. That is, if we have a faithful priest. For those who attend a Traditional Latin Mass, I do think we need to affirm girls and women in the life of the parish more. Submission to men relative to second and third wave feminism might be important, but we have a worldly hypermasculinity and misogyny just floating around in our culture. We absolutely cannot just say, “No enemies to the Right of me” in politics, and hope for the best. Fr. Ripperger is walking into chapels with quasi-military weapons, for Pete’s sake. We’re gonna own the libs and still lose our souls.

One more thought on aesthetics and beauty in the liturgy: Someone might have been scandalized by liturgical abuse and frivolous music, and that’s a true reality. I heard a Gloria setting that precisely recreates the theme music from the kids’ cartoon My Little Pony. It’s a perfectly lovely show/franchise, but it’s all I can do not to laugh every time it happens. I heard a responsorial hymn/song that probably should be sued by Barry Manilow. I laughed that time. I’ll be OK; if you’re gonna get the giggles, Divine Mercy Sunday is maybe the best day to do it. But we can do better than that. I can always play my Manilow after Mass. But we invented Gregorian chant. Have you heard it? They use it on TV to symbolize holiness and Heaven for a reason.

I will say that we have to be intentional. And that cosplaying and nostalgia aren’t enough.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

We Don't Need No Magisterium: (Jason's Version) (But Actually, We Do)

Hilarious Com-Box Quote of The Day: "I was caught immediately because it is the Acts of the Apostles, not the Acts of the Holy Spirit Acting Erratically."--Donald Todd, reacting to the inartful opposition of the Holy Spirit and the Magisterium. Mark Galli, an editor at Christianity Today, had suggested that today's "confusion" in evangelicalism replicates a confusion on the day of Pentecost. Mr. Todd commented after this reply , and the original article is here. My thoughts: By what means was this Church-less "consensus" formed? If the Council did not possess the authority to adjudicate such questions, who does? If the Council Fathers did not intend to be the arbiters, why do they say that they do? At the risk of being rude, I would define evangelicalism as, "Whatever I want or need to believe at any particular time." Ecclesial authority to settle a particular question is a step forward, but only as long as, "God alone is Lord of the con...

Dear Alyse

 Today, you’re 35. Or at least you would be, in this place. You probably know this, but we’re OK. Not great, but OK. We know you wouldn’t want us moping around and weeping all the time. We try not to. Actually, I guess part of the problem is that you didn’t know how much we loved you. And that you didn’t know how to love yourself. I hope you have gotten to Love by now. Not a place, but fills everything in every way. I’m not Him, but he probably said, “Dear daughter/sister, you have been terribly hard on yourself. Rest now, and be at peace.” Anyway, teaching is going well, and I tell the kids all about you. They all say you are pretty. I usually can keep the boys from saying something gross for a few seconds. Mom and I are going to the game tonight. And like 6 more times, before I go back to South Carolina. I have seen Nicky twice, but I myself haven’t seen your younger kids. Bob took pictures of the day we said goodbye, and we did a family picture at the Abbey. I literally almost a...

Who Is Out Here Having Sex And Children With People They Don’t Like?

 And look, I’m not married. I’ve never been married. I have no children. I didn’t choose that; things just worked out that way. If you must know, I haven’t had sexual intercourse either. I probably should say “coitus,” so I am not arguing with some progressive activist about what “sexual intercourse” means. But I figured out from influencer videos or something what a “dead bedroom” was. Unless a couple mutually agrees that they don’t want to have sex/coitus anymore (hopefully to pray and serve) this is usually bad. I’ve known enough couples that it’s probably an indicator of trouble, especially for couples who are still able to have children. Is it really that wild to at least hope that Mr. and Mrs. Vance love each other? That a fourth child yet born at least might indicate that they enjoy each other?  Children are definitely not responsible for their parents’ happiness. That’s absolutely true. But wouldn’t any child hope their parents were happy, when they came into being? As...