Skip to main content

Charlie Kirk

 He was killed one year ago today. I can remember when Turning Point USA started; I didn’t think much of him, I’ll be honest. Especially in the early days, I didn’t think it was useful or helpful to troll the Left. Whatever the “conservative movement” is or was, I still think ideas are important, and because ideas have to do in this sphere with how people govern themselves, persuading people should be the goal of politics and policy. 

If there is any meaning to the terms “far Left” and “far Right,” I think it would have to apply to people who are unwilling to tolerate those who differ from them, up to and including using violence to achieve their goals. In that way, Charlie Kirk absolutely was quaint in his belief in persuasion. He became a Christian somewhere in there. And I don’t say that so I can praise him to the skies; I’m not a middle-aged liberal Catholic deacon who reviews movies on the side. And I don’t think I’m the rightist opposite, either. Kirk definitely made me uncomfortable more than once. I definitely don’t think he deserved to die.

I would have to say that the man had a certain patience and courage. He could be found at college campuses, because he believed that the young were the future. Our political class has somehow managed to delay the future, mostly to our detriment. Even when the young take their place, we may have to re-learn the lessons of communism and atheistic socialism all over again. Hopefully that cost isn’t paid in blood, as it was before.

At least Charlie Kirk won’t have to worry about it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

We Don't Need No Magisterium: (Jason's Version) (But Actually, We Do)

Hilarious Com-Box Quote of The Day: "I was caught immediately because it is the Acts of the Apostles, not the Acts of the Holy Spirit Acting Erratically."--Donald Todd, reacting to the inartful opposition of the Holy Spirit and the Magisterium. Mark Galli, an editor at Christianity Today, had suggested that today's "confusion" in evangelicalism replicates a confusion on the day of Pentecost. Mr. Todd commented after this reply , and the original article is here. My thoughts: By what means was this Church-less "consensus" formed? If the Council did not possess the authority to adjudicate such questions, who does? If the Council Fathers did not intend to be the arbiters, why do they say that they do? At the risk of being rude, I would define evangelicalism as, "Whatever I want or need to believe at any particular time." Ecclesial authority to settle a particular question is a step forward, but only as long as, "God alone is Lord of the con...

Dear Alyse

 Today, you’re 35. Or at least you would be, in this place. You probably know this, but we’re OK. Not great, but OK. We know you wouldn’t want us moping around and weeping all the time. We try not to. Actually, I guess part of the problem is that you didn’t know how much we loved you. And that you didn’t know how to love yourself. I hope you have gotten to Love by now. Not a place, but fills everything in every way. I’m not Him, but he probably said, “Dear daughter/sister, you have been terribly hard on yourself. Rest now, and be at peace.” Anyway, teaching is going well, and I tell the kids all about you. They all say you are pretty. I usually can keep the boys from saying something gross for a few seconds. Mom and I are going to the game tonight. And like 6 more times, before I go back to South Carolina. I have seen Nicky twice, but I myself haven’t seen your younger kids. Bob took pictures of the day we said goodbye, and we did a family picture at the Abbey. I literally almost a...

Who Is Out Here Having Sex And Children With People They Don’t Like?

 And look, I’m not married. I’ve never been married. I have no children. I didn’t choose that; things just worked out that way. If you must know, I haven’t had sexual intercourse either. I probably should say “coitus,” so I am not arguing with some progressive activist about what “sexual intercourse” means. But I figured out from influencer videos or something what a “dead bedroom” was. Unless a couple mutually agrees that they don’t want to have sex/coitus anymore (hopefully to pray and serve) this is usually bad. I’ve known enough couples that it’s probably an indicator of trouble, especially for couples who are still able to have children. Is it really that wild to at least hope that Mr. and Mrs. Vance love each other? That a fourth child yet born at least might indicate that they enjoy each other?  Children are definitely not responsible for their parents’ happiness. That’s absolutely true. But wouldn’t any child hope their parents were happy, when they came into being? As...