Skip to main content

He Deserves A Real Answer

Monergism is a cruel mistress. It's fun to stay at the RCIA! [Terrible. Just terrible.--ed.]
Labels:

Comments

Timothy R. Butler said…
That's an absurd example that I ended up breaking my moratorium on CtC to read... No thoughtful monergist would agree with that logic, obviously. I didn't realize where the link went! No fair! ;-)
3:32 PM
Jason said…
It's not CTC.
12:46 AM
Jason said…
Like "no true Scotsman"?
12:51 AM
Timothy R. Butler said…
No, more of a straw man. I don't know of actual monergists who speak that way. I'm sure you could dig up someone, but if even the craziest, nastiest representatives are fair play, then I could do the same and everyone could spend all day arguing about our respective straw men that are not even sort of representative. It makes for a good laugh if you enjoy beating up on monergism, but doesn't forward the discussion.

My argument has always been we should argue against a debate opponent's best representatives, not their worst.
2:15 PM
Jason said…
A "thoughtful monergist" is not a monergist at all, which is what he's trying to demonstrate. He's not representing a Reformed position; he's drawing a logical implication of it. It's a dilemma. You can't accuse someone of misrepresenting something you don't understand.
2:22 PM
Timothy R. Butler said…
And what don't I understand? I suspect I understand a good deal better than you are giving me credit for.

My point is, this sort of attack is used against Augustine even -- I've seen people do it. But, it misses the mark. Note that the "thoughtful monergist" (let's call him TM) doesn't deny James's statement that faith without works is dead. Rather, the TM will argue that while the work all comes from God, the life that God is working in will show fruit. Saying, "Well, I'm forgiven no matter what, so I'll just kill myself and enjoy the afterlife" doesn't sound like a life showing fruit, so -- Biblically, speaking -- I would say that such a person is the seed that fell on the rocky soil, not someone who is actually regenerate.

That's pretty much what TMs have said over the ages.
3:20 PM
Jason said…
St. Augustine isn't even close to a monergist.
3:23 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dear Alyse

 Today, you’re 35. Or at least you would be, in this place. You probably know this, but we’re OK. Not great, but OK. We know you wouldn’t want us moping around and weeping all the time. We try not to. Actually, I guess part of the problem is that you didn’t know how much we loved you. And that you didn’t know how to love yourself. I hope you have gotten to Love by now. Not a place, but fills everything in every way. I’m not Him, but he probably said, “Dear daughter/sister, you have been terribly hard on yourself. Rest now, and be at peace.” Anyway, teaching is going well, and I tell the kids all about you. They all say you are pretty. I usually can keep the boys from saying something gross for a few seconds. Mom and I are going to the game tonight. And like 6 more times, before I go back to South Carolina. I have seen Nicky twice, but I myself haven’t seen your younger kids. Bob took pictures of the day we said goodbye, and we did a family picture at the Abbey. I literally almost a...
Post a Comment
Read more
Hilarious Com-Box Quote of The Day: "I was caught immediately because it is the Acts of the Apostles, not the Acts of the Holy Spirit Acting Erratically."--Donald Todd, reacting to the inartful opposition of the Holy Spirit and the Magisterium. Mark Galli, an editor at Christianity Today, had suggested that today's "confusion" in evangelicalism replicates a confusion on the day of Pentecost. Mr. Todd commented after this reply , and the original article is here. My thoughts: By what means was this Church-less "consensus" formed? If the Council did not possess the authority to adjudicate such questions, who does? If the Council Fathers did not intend to be the arbiters, why do they say that they do? At the risk of being rude, I would define evangelicalism as, "Whatever I want or need to believe at any particular time." Ecclesial authority to settle a particular question is a step forward, but only as long as, "God alone is Lord of the con...
17 comments
Read more

A Friend I Once Had, And The Dogmatic Principle

 I once had a friend, a dear friend, who helped me with personal care needs in college. Reformed Presbyterian to the core. When I was a Reformed Presbyterian, I visited their church many times. We were close. I still consider his siblings my friends. (And siblings in the Lord.) Nevertheless, when I began to consider the claims of the Catholic Church to be the Church Christ founded, he took me out to breakfast. He implied--but never quite stated--that we would not be brothers, if I sought full communion with the Catholic Church. That came true; a couple years later, I called him on his birthday, as I'd done every year for close to ten of them. He didn't recognize my number, and it was the most strained, awkward phone call I have ever had. We haven't spoken since. We were close enough that I attended the rehearsal dinner for his wedding. His wife's uncle is a Catholic priest. I remember reading a blog post of theirs, that early in their relationship, she told him of the p...
Post a Comment
Read more